Pseng Pseng: More Than Selective Attention or Ignorance

Pseng-Pseng

More Than Selective Attention or Ignorance

“Now there are [people] using the religious sector – monks and Buddhism – for political purposes. This is a very dangerous problem. This problem is making Buddhism evaporate and this is very dangerous….. We need to find the solution to solve this problem.”

Phnom Penh governor Pa Socheatvong, 19 December 2013

“អង្គអនុសំវច្ឆរមហាសន្និបាតមន្ត្រីសង្ឍទូទាំងប្រទេសលើកទី ២០ បានសម្រេចគាំទ្រយ៉ាងពេញទំហឹង​នូវ​បេក្ខភាពសម្តេចអគ្គមហាសេនាបតី តេជោ ហ៊ុន សែន ជានាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រី សម្រាប់អាណត្តិខាងមុខ និងអាណត្តិ​ក្រោយៗទៀត ...”

សង្ឃប្រកាស លេខ១០៤/១១ ស.ន.ក.ជ ចុះថ្ងៃទី២១ ខែធ្នូ ឆ្នាំ ២០១១

“But if the monks vote and take one side, there will be discrimination in pagodas and we are afraid the monks will starve. In the past few months, the contributions to Buddhism have decreased by $1 million. When Khmer New Year comes, will [donations] continue to decrease or not? How about Pchum Ben next year, are [donations] going to decrease again? If in one year there is a decrease of $1 million, and this decrease happens two or three times, the monks will starve.”

Phnom Penh governor Pa Socheatvong, 19 December 2013

"...ទេ ចុះមកឆ្កួតជាមួយនឹងអាត្មាម៉េច អាឆ្កួត មកឲ្យធ្វើអំពាវនាវម៉េច កុំមកនាំអញឆ្កួត អញមិនឆ្កួតទេវើយ អញប្រាប់មិញហើយថា ច្បាប់ជារឿងរបស់ខ្លួនឯងទេ កុំនាំអញឆ្កួត អញមិនឆ្កួតជាមួយពួកអាជំគួតអស់ហ្នឹងទេ។"

The Great Supreme Patriarch Tep Vong, 17 December 2013

“Don’t come to beg from them [the government]. They have no rice for you. They only have dog shit for you.”

The Great Supreme Patriarch Tep Vong, 17 December 2013

Pa Socheatvong must be suffering from either ignorance or a simple case of selective attention. Either way, his outburst on the involvement of monks and religion in politics is remarkable and maybe very revealing, unless he is lying to create pressure on monks opposing the CPP.

First, it is indeed hard to see how Pa Socheatvong or CPP can claim a moral high ground when the top monk establishment in the country declares its strong support for Hun Sen candidacy for prime minister position.

Second, the drop in contributions to monks Pa Socheatvong claims is most interesting. It is reasonable to assume as the CPP has full political control over the monk establishments, the drop and the amount he refers are likely to be accurate.

It is possible Pa Socheatvong is right when claiming the drop is attributable to congregations being sick and tired of monks playing politics, or being used for political gains.

He ignores other possibilities, however. Given the congregations are made up of decent and tolerant people, it is likely that the vulgarity of the top monk has eventually got into them. It may also have something to do with the political stuff-up after the elections. The growing reluctant CPP supporters may see it as an opportunity to stop, or reduce, funding for monks’ SUVs and their layman lifestyle. Some would say even Tep Vong’s claim that the government has only “dog shit” for the people is not exactly his vote of confidence in the CPP either.

This one million dollar drop within a few months must be significant, and worries Pa Socheatvong. Why else does he speak of starving the monks if he is not politically motivated to lie?

UBA

30xii13