Leaflet arrests questioned
The arrests and temporary detainment of two union activists for
passing out pamphlets yesterday has union supporters and a prominent
lawyer questioning whether a law even exists that would justify the
police action.
“When my accountant and I were passing out leaflets to Evergreen
workers, a few policemen came and grabbed my bag and motorcycle key
without saying anything to us,” Sareoun told the Post yesterday.
“After that, they took us to their office for questioning and released
us after we agreed to thumbprint a document” about an hour later.
Phnom Penh City Hall spokesman Long Dimanche yesterday said the
arrests were legitimate, because the law requires people to get
permission from the government before handing out any kind of flyer to
the public.
Sareoun and Nith’s arrests yesterday serve as an example of the consequences people who break this law will face, Dimanche said.
“Anyone who illegally distributes leaflets will face detainment by authorities,” Dimanche told the Post yesterday. “Our authorities will arrest them again if they hand out leaflets without a letter of permission.”
The flyers Sareoun and Nith handed out encouraged workers to
participate in an attempted industry-wide boycott of overtime work, in
protest at the government’s refusal to set the garment sector’s 2014
minimum wage at $160 per month and release 21 detainees arrested at
demonstrations supporting a garment worker strike early last month.
A law requiring people to receive government approval before handing
out free literature sounded far-fetched to Sok Sam Oeun, an attorney and
president of the Cambodian Defenders Project.
“I don’t think there is such a law,” Sam Oeun said after hearing of
the arrests. “I think that giving a pamphlet like that, I think that is
just part of freedom.”
Police can intervene if pamphlets are passed out to incite people to
take action against the government, Sam Oeun said. But such action is
reserved for cases in which the literature suggests violent action
toward police and government officials.
The arrests yesterday also made little sense to Moeun Tola, head of
the Community Legal Education Center’s labour program, who has attended
and moderated meetings of union groups supporting the boycott.
“What they claim is just groundless,” said Tola, who wondered if
people passing out flyers advertising bars and restaurants are required
to seek permission from the government. “I think the main purpose is for
the authorities to restrict, to intimidate the group of unions”
supporting the boycott.
Tola added that military police presence inside garment factories
this week is a ploy to bully workers into working overtime, rather than
leave after their eight-hour shifts.
Military police spokesman Kheng Tito yesterday confirmed military
police presence inside factories, but said it was a security measure.
No comments:
Post a Comment