Will Aung San Suu Kyi ever become president of Burma?
Given
how rapidly things have changed in Burma, the country also known as
Myanmar, it's tempting to see further reforms as inevitable. They're
not.
On the surface it looks good. Political prisoners have been
released and new laws have transformed the country's media landscape and
economic prospects.
But scratch a little deeper and reforms are harder to find.
The power wielded by Burma's army remains largely untouched, and there's
so far been no sign that after decades at the helm the generals are
going to start taking orders from civilians.
One of the more public indicators of the difficulties being
faced by the reform process is a parliamentary review of the 2008
military-drafted constitution. Last week the 108-member constitutional
review committee published its report, having received nearly 30,000
submissions on a broad range of issues.
Barrier to presidency
For Aung San Suu Kyi it makes depressing reading. With next
year's election looming the 68-year-old's overriding concern is to get
the clause that bars her from becoming president changed.
Having married an Oxford academic, Ms Suu Kyi's two adult sons,
Alexander and Kim, are both British, with little appetite for trading
in their EU passports.
For the most part the parliamentary report skirts controversy
by simply summarising the submissions it received. On Articles 59 and
60 which include the "Suu Kyi clause", for example, it states that 5,740
people had requested that it be amended, 55 that it be added to, 194
that it be removed and 51 that it be retained.
The few recommendations that have been made appear subtly designed to thwart Ms Suu Kyi's ambitions.
Priority should be given to changes that do not need a
referendum, the report says (59F does), and also those related to
consolidating peace with Burma's many armed ethnic groups.
"This severely hampers [Ms Suu Kyi's] strategy to remove the
barrier to her becoming president," says Andrew McLeod, a lecturer in
law from Oxford University and the deputy director of the Myanmar
Constitutional Reform Project.
"If she continues to campaign on the presidential
qualification issue, it could reinforce an impression that she's putting
self-interest above the concerns of ethnic groups."
A trap?
With this first committee having taken several months to make
its still inconclusive findings another was promptly set up - this time
an "implementation" committee, with 31 members, just two of them from Ms
Suu Kyi's party.
With her frustration visibly growing, Ms Suu Kyi's thoughts may be returning to the closing months of 2011.
Then, she held a series of meetings with President Thein Sein
which culminated in the momentous announcement that for the first time
in more than two decades Ms Suu Kyi's party, the National League for
Democracy (NLD), would compete in elections.
With that decision the Burmese political landscape was
transformed and when by-elections were held on the 1 April 2012 Burma's
status in the world changed decisively for the better.
Ms Suu Kyi and 42 of her NLD colleagues became members of
parliament and a much derided political system could suddenly claim real
legitimacy. Sceptics of the reform process around the world had to
take a back seat and western countries quickly lifted economic sanctions
and began to re-engage diplomatically.
"We will need to have all necessary measures in place in order to defend our national interests ” - Thein Sein President of Burma
At the time most assumed that in
return for handing in her best bargaining chip Ms Suu Kyi had received
guarantees from Thein Sein that he would champion the necessary
constitutional changes.
So far that has not been the case. In public at least, Thein Sein is equivocal on the need for constitutional reform.
"I would not want restrictions being imposed on the right of
any citizen to become the leader of the country," Thein Sein said in
early January, before cautioning: "At the same time, we will need to
have all necessary measures in place in order to defend our national
interests and sovereignty."
Sovereignty is frequently mentioned by those seeking to
justify the continued existence of 59F. Without clear direction from the
top, and with the army possessing a veto in parliament the chances of a
President Suu Kyi any time soon are remote.
"I think she's walked into a trap," David Mathieson, the Burma researcher for Human Rights Watch, said.
"I enter into your parliamentary process and legitimise your
process, and in return you will amend 59F so I can be considered for
president. Two years later that is looking more and more like a trap."
No comments:
Post a Comment