Radar Suggests Jet Shifted Path More Than Once
International New York Times | 14 March 2014
SEPANG,
Malaysia — Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 experienced significant changes
in altitude after it lost contact with ground control, and altered its
course more than once as if still under the command of a pilot, American
officials and others familiar with the investigation said Friday.
Radar
signals recorded by the Malaysian military appeared to show that the
missing airliner climbed to 45,000 feet, above the approved altitude
limit for a Boeing 777-200, soon after it disappeared from civilian
radar and turned sharply to the west, according to a preliminary
assessment by a person familiar with the data.
There,
officials believe, the plane turned from a southwest-bound course,
climbed to a higher altitude and flew northwest over the Strait of
Malacca toward the Indian Ocean.
Investigators
have also examined data transmitted from the plane’s Rolls-Royce
engines that showed it descended 40,000 feet in the span of a minute,
according to a senior American official briefed on the investigation.
But investigators do not believe the readings are accurate because the
aircraft would most likely have taken longer to fall such a distance.
“A
lot of stock cannot be put in the altitude data” sent from the engines,
one official said. “A lot of this doesn’t make sense.”
The
data, while incomplete and difficult to interpret, could still provide
critical new clues as investigators try to determine what happened on
Flight 370, which disappeared early last Saturday carrying 239 people
from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing.
Malaysian
and international investigators have said in recent days that the plane
may have departed from its northerly route toward Beijing and headed
west across the Malaysian peninsula just after the aircraft disappeared
from civilian radar, its pilots stopped communicating with ground
controllers and its transponders stopped transmitting data about its
speed and location. The plane is also now thought to have continued
flying for more than four hours after diverting its course, based on
automated pings sent by onboard systems to satellites.
But
the Malaysian military radar data, which local authorities have
declined to provide to the public, added significant information about
the flight immediately after ground controllers lost contact with it.
The combination of altitude changes and at least two significant course
corrections could have a variety of explanations, including that a pilot
or a hijacker diverted the plane, or that it flew unevenly without a
pilot after the crew became disabled.
The
erratic movements of the aircraft after it diverted course and flew
over Malaysia also raise questions about why the military did not
respond to the flight emergency. Malaysian officials have acknowledged
that military radar may have detected the plane, but have said they took
no action because it did not appear hostile.
A
week after the jet’s disappearance, the Malaysian authorities have
shared few details with American investigators, frustrating senior
officials in Washington. “They’re keeping us at a distance,” one of the
officials said.
But
investigators in Malaysia and the United States recently began
receiving additional data about the plane and anticipate more over the
weekend, according to a senior American official. “It’s gotten better
and better every day,” the official said, referring to information from
the plane’s manufacturer, satellites and military radar. “It should
provide more clarity to the flight path. It’s not a given, but it’s a
hope.”
Because
the plane stopped transmitting its position about 40 minutes after
takeoff, military radar recorded only an unidentified blip moving
through Malaysian airspace. Certain weather conditions, and even flocks
of birds, can occasionally cause radar blips that may be mistaken for
aircraft. The Malaysian authorities said they were still studying the
signals to determine whether they came from Flight 370.
But
the person who examined the data said it left little doubt that the
airliner flew near or through the southern tip of Thailand, then back
across Peninsular Malaysia, near the city of Penang, and out over the
sea again. That is in part because the data is based on signals recorded
by two radar stations, at the Royal Malaysian Air Force’s Butterworth
base on the peninsula’s west coast, near Penang, and at Kota Bharu, on
the northeast coast. Two radars tracking a contact can significantly
increase the reliability of the readings.
Still,
Ravi Madavaram, an aerospace engineer at the consulting firm Frost
& Sullivan, based in Kuala Lumpur, said the accuracy of ground-based
radars in determining a plane’s altitude diminishes the farther away
the plane is. When Flight 370 lost contact with ground controllers, it
was more than 100 miles from Kota Bharu and 200 miles from Butterworth,
distances that he said could degrade accuracy. But the altitudes
measured as the plane crossed the peninsula would be more reliable, he
said.
A
senior aircraft industry executive in the United States said the
account of Flight 370’s movements that was emerging from the Malaysian
military radar information matched what their officials were told.
“Everything we have heard is consistent with the plane flying under the
control of someone with at least some flying experience,” said the
industry executive, who asked not to be identified because of the tense
nature of the conversation underway with the Malaysian authorities.
Military
radar last recorded the aircraft flying at an altitude of 29,500 feet,
about 200 miles northwest of Penang and headed toward India’s Andaman
Islands. The normal cruising altitude of a long-range commercial
jetliner is between 30,000 and 40,000 feet.
Cengiz
Turkoglu, a senior lecturer in aeronautical engineering at City
University London who specializes in aviation safety, said a deliberate
act in the cockpit could cause a radical change in altitude. “It is
extremely difficult for an aircraft to physically, however heavy it
might be, to free fall,” he said.
An
Asia-based pilot of a Boeing 777-200, who asked not to be identified
because he was not authorized to speak to reporters, said an ascent
above the plane’s service limit of 43,100 feet, along with a
depressurized cabin, could have rendered the passengers and crew
unconscious, and could be a deliberate maneuver by a pilot or a
hijacker.
Other
experts said that altitude changes would be expected if the pilots
became disabled after the plane’s autopilot was disengaged. Changes in
the weight distribution on the plane as fuel burned off would make the
plane descend and climb repeatedly, though changes in course would be
harder to explain.
American
officials were concerned in the first few days after the plane
disappeared that terrorists had brought it down. But as investigators
have examined the flight manifest and looked into the two Iranian men
who were on the plane traveling with stolen passports, they have become
convinced that there is no clear connection to terrorism.
The
Federal Bureau of Investigation interviewed family members of the
Iranian men and used computer programs to determine whether they had
ties to terrorists. Those efforts showed no such connections, leading
the investigators to believe the men were smugglers.
The
investigators considered but dismissed the possibility that hijackers
landed the plane somewhere for later use in a terrorist attack,
according to a senior American official briefed on the investigation.
The data, the official said, “leads them to believe that it either ran out of fuel or crashed right before it ran out of fuel.”
It
would take a long runway to land a plane of that size, the official
said. Although the radius that the plane could have flown extends into
South Asia, the official added, “the idea it could cross into Indian
airspace and not get picked up made no sense.”
No comments:
Post a Comment