Top Ukrainians Accusing Russia of an Invasion
International New York Times | 28 Feb. 2014
KIEV,
Ukraine — Ukraine’s fragile new government accused Russia of trying to
provoke a military conflict on Friday by invading the Crimea region,
while in Washington President Obama issued a stern warning to the
Kremlin about respecting Ukraine’s sovereignty, apparently in an effort
to preclude a full-scale military escalation. [President Obama, please issue one to Vietnam re Cambodia's sovereignty, too. Don't just leave it to China to do so.]
Mr.
Obama, however, cited “reports of military movements taken by the
Russian Federation inside of Ukraine,” and he said, “Any violation of
Ukrainian sovereignty would be deeply destabilizing.”
“There will be costs,” Mr. Obama said in a hastily arranged statement from the White House.
The
pointed warning came after a day in which military analysts struggled
to understand a series of unusual events in Crimea, including a
mobilization of armored personnel carriers with Russian markings on the
roads of the region’s capital, Simferopol, and a deployment of
well-armed masked gunmen at Crimea’s two main airports.
“The
Russian Federation began an unvarnished aggression against our
country,” Mr. Turchynov said in nationally televised remarks on Friday
evening. “Under the guise of military exercises, they entered troops
into the autonomous Republic of Crimea.”
He
said that Russian forces had captured the regional Parliament, as well
as the headquarters of the regional government, and that they had sought
to seize other targets, including vital communications hubs, and to
block unspecified Ukrainian military assets.
United
States officials said they believed that the unusual helicopter
movements over Crimea were evidence that a military intervention was
underway, but cautioned that they did not know the scale of the
operation or the Russians’ motives.
Russia
on Friday denied that it had or would encroach on Ukrainian territory,
and claimed that any troop movements were in line with arrangements that
allow it to station soldiers in the area.
Still,
developments in Ukraine sent Ukraine’s interim government, appointed
just the day before, deep into crisis mode as it confronted the prospect
of an armed effort to split off Crimea, an autonomous region with close
historic ties to Russia, from the Ukrainian mainland.
Analysts
said the increase in the Russian presence in the area had parallels to
steps Russia took before beginning a war with Georgia in 2008 over the
largely ethnic Russian regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, but there
was little to indicate whether President Vladimir V. Putin intended to
escalate the challenge to Ukraine beyond the so-far nonviolent
provocation of the mostly pro-Russian population in the region.
Mr. Turchynov, the acting president, also made comparisons to Georgia.
“They are provoking us into military conflict,” Mr. Turchynov said. “They began annexation of territory.”
In
his address, Mr. Turchynov added, “I personally appeal to President
Putin, demanding that he immediately stop the provocation and withdraw
troops.”
The
crisis in Crimea, along the Black Sea, is the latest development in a
series of rapidly unfurling events that began after scores of people
were killed in Kiev last week in a severe escalation of civic unrest
that had been underway since late November.
Protests
started after Russia pressured Viktor F. Yanukovych, then the
president, to back away from sweeping political and free-trade
agreements with the European Union that he had long promised to sign,
setting off an East-West confrontation reminiscent of the Cold War.
After
the recent killings, Mr. Yanukovych reached a tentative truce with
opposition leaders in talks brokered by the foreign ministers of France,
Germany and Poland, but within 24 hours he fled the capital, and an
overwhelming majority of lawmakers voted to strip him of power, saying
he had abandoned his position.
On
Friday, a week later, Mr. Yanukovych resurfaced for a news conference
in Rostov-on-Don, Russia, in which he said he was still the legitimate
president and urged Russia not to intervene militarily in Crimea.
Mr.
Obama’s warning suggested a deepening uncertainty among American
officials about Mr. Putin’s intentions in the region [as China is worried about Vietnam's intentions in Cambodia] despite a series of
high-level contacts in recent days, including a telephone call between
the two presidents one week ago. Mr. Yanukovych was an ally of Russia,
and his toppling has left the Kremlin grappling for a response.
Another
American official said that intelligence reports from the region are
“all over the place,” but that the administration believed that Russia
had moved some of its forces into Ukraine, while some of the movement,
officials said, seemed to be an increase in protective measures around
Russian military installations.
Though
he threatened an unspecified “cost” to Russia, Mr. Obama appeared to
have limited options to respond to an intervention. Officials said he
could cancel his participation in a Group of 8 meeting in Sochi, Russia,
in June. The administration could also shut down talks on a potential
trade agreement. Russia sent a delegation to Washington this week to
explore closer trade and commercial ties.
Crimea,
a multi-ethnic region that was granted a large degree of autonomy in
1992 after Ukraine gained independence from the Soviet Union, has long
been a source of tension with Russia and is the headquarters of some of
Russia’s most important military installations, including the
headquarters of its Black Sea naval fleet.
As
the international community reacted with consternation to the
developments in Crimea, the Kremlin, as enigmatic as ever, remained
largely silent.
Russian
state television reported that Russian troops at arrived to secure the
airport at Belbek, which is close to the Russian navy headquarters, but
Russian officials did not confirm that information. The identity of
gunmen who appeared at the Simferopol airport and at roadblocks on major
roadways also remained unclear.
In
a statement, Russia’s Foreign Ministry acknowledged that the movement
of armored vehicles from the base in Sevastapol had occurred “to ensure
the security” of Russian forces, but added that the maneuvers were
“fully in accordance” with the conditions of its lease, which was
extended until 2042 as part of a deal in which Ukraine received
discounts on Russian natural gas.
While
the movement of Russian military vehicles, equipment and personnel is
common in the Crimea, Friday’s activity was extremely unusual, local
residents said. It involved a number of strange components, including
the deployment of heavily armed soldiers, wearing uniforms with no
identifying marks, at the region’s two main airports.
Before
dawn, at Simferopol’s international airport, the soldiers initially
posted themselves outside an administrative building, and through much
of the day they did not interfere with departing or arriving flights.
Journalists
spotted a convoy of nine Russian armored personnel carriers on a road
between the port city of Sevastopol, Russia’s main naval base, and
Simferopol, the Crimean capital, a city of about 250,000. There were
also unconfirmed reports that several planes carrying thousands of
Russian soldiers had arrived in the Crimea on Friday night.
Even
more unusual, a Ukrainian telecommunications company, Ukrtelecom, said
“unknown people” had seized control of several communications hubs
disrupting telephone and Internet service between Crimea and the rest of
Ukraine. In a statement, the company pleaded with law enforcement
agencies to take control of the situation.
While
Western governments initially seemed hesitant to draw conclusions,
officials in the new provisional government in Kiev said early Friday
morning that they suspected Russian interference.
Mr.
Turchynov, who is speaker of Parliament, immediately convened a meeting
of the newly-formed National Security and Defense Council to discuss
the events in the south.
No comments:
Post a Comment