the country is so gravely divided that it has lost the ability to govern itself.
After Thai Military Declares Martial Law, Protesters Continue Their Rallies
International New York Times | 20 May 2014
BANGKOK
— Questions intensified about the intentions of Thailand’s military on
Wednesday, a day after the head of the army declared martial law and
curbed media freedoms but allowed protesters to continue their
demonstrations — which they did with enthusiasm.
It
was at least the 12th time the military has intervened in Thailand
since the country switched from an absolute monarchy to a democracy
eight decades ago. It was the first military intervention in Thailand’s
latest political convulsions, which began six months ago and have
paralyzed the government.
In the first few hours, nobody knew exactly what to make of the declaration, which gives the military broad powers to disperse and arrest protesters, censor the news media and control many government functions.
Military
vehicles and armed soldiers took positions on Bangkok streets, some
television stations closed, and the military issued a warning against
provocative comments on social media.
Yet,
in many neighborhoods, not a soldier could be seen. Workplaces and
schools remained open, people shopped, the stock market closed the day 1
percent lower and traffic backed up as it would have on any other
workday. Tourists could be seen snapping photographs with smiling
soldiers.
Thousands
of Thais determined to show their opposition toward the governing party
assembled along a broad avenue, dancing and cheering in the oppressive
heat.
“Please
protest with joy!” said Sathit Wongnongtoey, a former member of
Parliament whose voice boomed over them. “Our protest will get even more
intense — 24 hours a day!”
Pro-government demonstrators also continued their rallies on the outskirts of Bangkok.
Thitinan
Pongsudhirak, one of the foremost experts on Thai politics, said, “It’s
technically martial law, but it doesn’t feel like it.”
Yet
the business-as-usual scenes on the streets of Bangkok masked what
analysts described as a high-stakes intervention in Thai politics by a
military that has a long, checkered past of overthrowing governments and
ruling despotically.
Martial
law was imposed without any notification to the caretaker government,
according to Chaturon Chaisang, the education minister, who questioned
the military’s motives.
Gen.
Prayuth Chan-ocha, the army chief, a brash and outspoken career soldier
who for months had publicly expressed reluctance to become involved in
the political crisis, cast himself on Tuesday as a mediator who would
summon all parties and forge an agreement. “That’s why I declared
martial law; otherwise, no one would listen,” he said.
General
Prayuth denied that the action was a military coup. But he was evasive
about how long martial law would be in force. “Don’t ask me how long
this will last,” he said. “No one wants to implement it for too long. I
want all sides to seek a solution quickly.”
He deflected reporters’ questions about whether he would answer to the caretaker government.
General
Prayuth faces a daunting challenge: to cajole some form of
reconciliation in a society split between the old-money elites in
Bangkok who are backing the antigovernment demonstrators and a populist
governing party with a power base in the provinces, led by a nouveau
riche tycoon, Thaksin Shinawatra.
The
last military coup was in 2006, and it overthrew the same political
movement that dominates the country today. But analysts say the current
impasse is more intractable than anything the military has taken on in
the past.
Thailand,
a leading economy of Southeast Asia, has been without a functioning
government since December. And with the eyes of the world watching, the
country is so gravely divided that it has lost the ability to govern
itself.
“The
army is taking a big risk here,” Mr. Thitinan said. “They will have to
bang heads to make a compromise happen. They will be pulled in different
directions. If they are seen as sliding toward one side, things could
turn nasty very quickly.”
Foreign reaction was largely critical. Human Rights Watch called it a “de facto coup.”
“The
military has pulled a 100-year-old law off the shelf that makes the
civilian administration subordinate to the military, effectively
rendering the executive, legislative and judicial branches powerless,”
Brad Adams, the director of the organization’s Asia division, said in a
statement.
The
Thai military sought to convince the public that the army had acted in
the country’s best interests. A message Tuesday morning on a
military-controlled television station read: “We urge people not to
panic. Please carry on your daily activities as usual. The imposition of
martial law is not a coup d’état.”
It remained unclear late Tuesday which side would benefit from the military’s intervention.
If
the military decides to force an election — and ensures that the
opposition does not obstruct it — the governing party would probably be
seen as the ultimate beneficiary. But if the military postpones
elections, it will strengthen the hand of the Bangkok establishment.
The
United States urged respect for “democratic principles” in a statement
released hours after the announcement of martial law. “We expect the
Army to honor its commitment to make this a temporary action to prevent
violence, and to not undermine democratic institutions,” the statement
said.
Japan, long one of Thailand’s largest investors, said it had “grave concerns about the situation in Thailand.”
General Prayuth was prickly in responding to questions.
When
reporters repeated a question about whether and when elections would
take place, he snapped, “I suggest you go visit a doctor and do
something about your ear.”
No comments:
Post a Comment