‘The 23’ put police on trial
Each of the 23 defendants who testified yesterday on charges
linked to the garment protests in early January denied involvement in
the violent demonstrations, while many said police beat false statements
out of them.
On the second full day of proceedings for the trial of nearly two
dozen people, judges and attorneys in two Phnom Penh Municipal Court
rooms completed questioning of all but three defendants. The cases are
scheduled to continue at 8am on May 20.
“The 23”, as they’ve come to be known on social media and in public
rallies in support of them, were all arrested in early January in a
violent crackdown on garment protests that were sparked by the
government announcing in late December a lower-than-desired rise in
minimum wage to $95.
No one has been arrested or brought to court over the shootings.
After the crackdown, the majority of defendants spent nearly four
months in jail before all had their first day in court on April 25,
though much of it was procedural. Proceedings yesterday, however,
involved far more testimony, most of which conflicted with official
accounts.
“They arrested me while I was riding to Svay Rieng province to bring
clothes to my wife, who just delivered our baby,” said Ros Sophoan, 25, a
garment and construction worker arrested on January 3. “After arresting
[and beating] me, police ordered me to run; police ran after me and
beat me again, like an animal.”
Shortly after proceedings began yesterday, prosecutor Top Chhun Long
grilled 34-year-old defendant and motodop Chea Sarath, asking him why
police found petrol on him when they arrested him on Veng Sreng
Boulevard after midnight on January 3; he presented a glass bottle
filled with petrol in a large zip-lock bag as evidence.
Chhun Long read an excerpt from the police report submitted to the
court – and signed by Sarath – that concluded he was one of the people
who intended to throw Molotov cocktails at authorities. “[Sarath]
received a bottle of gasoline from a group of demonstrators with orders
to throw it at police,” Chhun Long read aloud.
Sarath testified that police actually arrested him at a nearby petrol
station as he filled his motorbike tank. Allegedly beaten at the scene
and again at the police station, Sarath signed the police report to
avoid another assault, he said.
When one of Sarath’s defence attorneys asked her client about his
injuries, Judge Leang Sarath ordered her to stick with questions related
to the charges. All the defendants are facing charges ranging from
inciting violence to aggravated intentional violence.
Like Chea Sarath, 17-year-old Yon Sok Chea asked the court to use his
direct account of events in the early hours of January 3, rather than
the contradictory police report, after Chhun Long inquired as to why Sok
Chea said he saw nobody throwing rocks at police.
One of two defendants who received bail, Sok Chea said police broke
his hand when they detained him as he stood in front of a residential
building watching the chaos with about 10 others. “While arresting me,
police used electric batons and beat my arm and head,” Sok Chea said.
In courtroom two, where the testimony from some of the defendants
arrested during the demonstration outside the Yakjin garment factory was
heard, one suspect also said evidence had been falsified.
During proceedings for those 10 defendants, Sokun Sombath Piseth, 31,
a networking officer at the Center for Labor Rights of Cambodia, said
he believed a photograph purporting to show him leading a group of
protesters in front of the factory was doctored.
Despite defence attorney Sam Sokong’s objection to the new evidence,
which he was unaware of being entered into court yesterday, Judge Keo
Mony allowed prosecutor Ly Sophanna to use the picture.
“I recognise it’s me in this photo, but I don’t recognise the whole
photo; I think it’s been edited with Photoshop,” Sombath Piseth said in
court, pointing out that the photo had no timestamp.
Three of the defendants in the Yakjin trial have yet to testify,
including Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association
president Vorn Pov, but Judge Sarath heard from all 13 arrested on Veng
Sreng, and two police officials on the victims list.
A separate case involving two people arrested during a November
march-turned-riot supporting a strike at SL Garment Processing wrapped
up yesterday. A verdict in that case will be read May 30.
Kim Rithy, deputy chief of the capital’s Prampi Makara district
police intervention unit, and Lay Vin, deputy chief of the district
police’s public order unit, each said they suffered injuries at the
hands of Veng Sreng demonstrators.
Rithy, who said he suffered permanent damage to his eye from a
projectile, is suing for 40 million riel ($10,000). Vin, who said
protesters dropping objects from a building injured his shoulder and
legs, is demanding 20 million riel ($5,000).
Pointing out that demonstrators early on January 3 used high-powered
flashlights to blind police and quickly blocked roads with trucks, Vin
said the tactics did not appear to be the work of amateurs.
“This was a clearly organised group,” Vin said.
No comments:
Post a Comment