Human nature hasn’t changed much. The surveys still reveal generations driven by curiosity, a desire to have a good family, a good community and good values. But people clearly feel besieged. There is the perception that life is harder. Certainly their parents think it is harder. The result is that you get a group hardened for battle, more focused on the hard utilitarian things and less focused on spiritual or philosophic things; feeling emotionally vulnerable, but also filled with résumé assertiveness. The inner world wanes; professional intensity waxes.
The Streamlined Life
International New York Times | 5 May 2014
Every
year researchers at U.C.L.A. do a survey of incoming college freshmen.
These surveys, conducted over four decades now, show how the life cycle
has changed over the past couple generations.
This
first thing you see from this and similar data sets is that high school
has gotten a bit easier. In 1966, only about 19 percent of high school
students graduated with an A or A- average. By 2013, 53 percent of
students graduated with that average.
The grades are higher even though, for many, the workload is lighter. As late as 1987, nearly half of high school students reported doing at least six hours of homework a week. By 2006, less than a third of all students reported doing that much work. In 1966, 48 percent of students said they sometimes showed up late to class. By 2006, more than 60 percent of students said they sometimes showed up late.
If
the high school world is lax, that changes when the college admissions
process starts. It’s not only that college admissions are more
competitive; students begin to be haunted by fears about their job
market prospects.
If
you go back and read oral histories conducted in the 1950s and 1960s,
you’d be amazed by how benign the labor market seemed back then. People
would announce that they were moving to a new city and assume they’d be
able to find decent work after they got there.
That
image of a benign job market is pretty much gone (as expectations about
what constitutes a good job have risen). Even incoming college freshmen
seem to fear they will not find lucrative and rewarding work. Harsh
economic thinking plays a much bigger role in how students perceive
their lives. Their parents feel that anxiety even more acutely.
In
the first place, they are very conscious of how much college costs. In
1974, 77 percent of students enrolled in their collegiate top choice. By
2013, only 57 percent were able to. Cost is a very important factor in
why students decided to stay away from their favorite school. Second,
they saw college much more as job training than students before. In
1976, 50 percent of freshmen said they were going to college in order to
make more money. By 2006, 69 percent of freshmen said that. Since 2005,
the number of students who say they are going to college to get a
better job has spiked upward.
Their
overall values change. In 1966, only 42 percent of freshmen said that
being well-off financially was an essential or very important life goal.
By 2005, 75 percent of students said being well-off financially was
essential or very important. Affluence, once a middling value, is now
tied as students’ top life goal.
I’m
not sure if students really are less empathetic, or less interested in
having meaning in their lives, but it has become more socially
acceptable to present yourself that way. In the shadow of this more
Darwinian job market, it is more acceptable to present yourself as
utilitarian, streamlined and success-oriented.
Psychologically,
the effect of all this is complicated. In 1985, only 18 percent of
freshmen said that they felt overwhelmed by all they had to do. By 2013,
33 percent said they felt overwhelmed. In 1985, 64 percent of students
said they ranked in the top 10 percent or at least above average in
terms of mental health. But today, students admit to being much more
emotionally vulnerable. They also declare low levels of spiritual
self-confidence.
At
the same time, one gets the sense they are trying to armor up, in
preparation for the rigors to come. They assert their talents. They rate
themselves much more highly than past generations on leadership skills,
writing abilities, social self-confidence and so on. For example, in
2009, roughly 75 percent of freshmen said they had a stronger drive to
achieve than their average peers.
Human
nature hasn’t changed much. The surveys still reveal generations driven
by curiosity, a desire to have a good family, a good community and good
values. But people clearly feel besieged. There is the perception that
life is harder. Certainly their parents think it is harder. The result
is that you get a group hardened for battle, more focused on the hard
utilitarian things and less focused on spiritual or philosophic things;
feeling emotionally vulnerable, but also filled with résumé
assertiveness. The inner world wanes; professional intensity waxes.
No comments:
Post a Comment