Human Rights Watch said in a report released on Wednesday to mark the anniversary that “Cambodia is in the process of reverting to a one-party state”.
Hun Sen, Cambodia's prime minister, marks 30 years of hardline rule
The Guardian | 14 January 2015
Strongman who rose from ashes of the Khmer Rouge era maintains a repressive and as-yet unshakeable grip on power
Hun Sen is marking 30 years as Cambodia’s prime minister, a reign
that has drawn condemnation over the litany human rights violations the
political strongman and former Khmer Rouge cadre is accused of
perpetrating to keep his grip on power in the decades following the
bloodthirsty communist regime’s demise.
Human Rights Watch marked the anniversary by accusing Hun Sen of
extrajudicial killings, torture, arbitrary arrests, summary trials,
censorship, bans on assembly and association and keeping a national
network of spies and informers intended to frighten and intimidate the
public into submission.
Since first taking up the job at age 33, becoming the world’s
youngest premier in the process, Hun Sen has consolidated power with
violence and intimidation of opponents that continues to draw criticism.
But he could also take some credit for bringing modest economic growth
and stability in a country devastated by the communist Khmer Rouge’s
regime in the 1970s, a movement Hun Sen abandoned as they left some 1.7
million people dead from starvation, disease and executions.
On Wednesday, in a speech inaugurating a 2,200 metre (7,200ft) Mekong
river bridge that is the country’s longest, Hun Sen, 62, defended his
record, saying that only he had been daring enough to tackle the Khmer
Rouge and help bring peace to Cambodia.
“If Hun Sen hadn’t been willing to enter the tigers’ den how could we
have caught the tigers?” he said. He acknowledged some shortcomings but
pleaded for observers to see the good as well as the bad in his
leadership.
Born to a peasant family in east-central Cambodia, Hun Sen initially
joined the Khmer Rouge against a pro-American government. He defected to
Vietnam in 1977 and accompanied the Vietnamese invasion that toppled
his former comrades in 1979.
The timely change of sides led to his being appointed foreign
minister, then prime minister of the Vietnamese-supported regime in
1985. Since then he has never left the top post despite being forced to
temporarily accept the title of “co-prime minister” after his party came
in second behind that of Prince Norodom Ranariddh in a 1993
UN-supervised election. Four years later Hun Sen deposed his coalition
partner in a bloody coup.
“It is superficially true that relative peace and stability occurred
during the reign of Hun Sen’s three decades in power,” said Theary
Seng, a Cambodian-American lawyer and human rights activist. “But Hun
Sen’s ‘achievements’ are only relative to the blackness of the Khmer
Rouge.”
The historian David Chandler, a Cambodia expert at Australia’s Monash University, characterised Hun Sen as “intelligent, combative, tactical, and self-absorbed”.
In 2013 elections it seemed Hun Sen’s grip on power had been shaken
when the opposition Cambodia National Rescue party mounted an
unexpectedly strong challenge, winning 55 seats in the National Assembly
with Hun Sen’s Cambodian People’s party reduced to 68.
The opposition alleged the results were rigged and its lawmakers at
first boycotted the legislature. But then Hun Sen brokered a deal with
opposition leader Sam Rainsy and the parliament resumed work, with the
longtime leader again appearing unscathed.
Human Rights Watch said in a report released on Wednesday to mark the
anniversary that “Cambodia is in the process of reverting to a
one-party state”.
“After 30 years of experience there is no reason to believe that Hun
Sen will wake up one day and decide to govern Cambodia in a more open,
inclusive, tolerant, and rights-respecting manner,” said the Asia
director at Human Rights Watch, Brad Adams, who wrote the report.
“The international community should begin listening to those
Cambodians who have increasingly demanded the protection and promotion
of their basic human rights.”
No comments:
Post a Comment