5 Famous Traitors Who Define the Word “Treason”
Everything is History | 7 January 2010
Treason is a very serious crime, which is often punishable by death.
In fact, it is so serious that it is the only crime which is defined in
the U.S. Consitution. However, the definition of treason does vary from
country to country, and has changed over time. For example, back in the
14th century, it was considered an act of treason to “imagine the death
of our lord the King, or of our lady his Queen or of their eldest son
and heir.” In modern-day Palestine, it is considered an act of treason
to sell land to Jews, even if they’re not Israeli citizens.
Hell, I’ve even been called a traitor for switching to a Mac despite
the fact that all of my training is in Windows. With such varied
definitions of treason, this list could have reached into the thousands,
but I want to focus on people whose actions are treasonous without
question. Thus, individuals like Nathan Hale and Gavrilo Princip were
left off the list. Here’s my list of 5 famous traitors.
Philippe Pétain: Pétain’s is a story of a fall from
grace. The French hero of World War I, he achieved the rank of Marshal
of France between the World Wars. This is similar to the ceremonial rank
that Gen. John Pershing
received in the U.S. With his success and popularity, Pétain was
encouraged to enter politics, but initially was not interested. However,
by 1940, the French were waging a war against Nazi Germany, and Pétain
was elected Chief of the French State, with the hope that his military
background would help France prevail. With high hopes, Pétain took
office in the summer of 1940, and proceeded to surrender to Germany a
few weeks later. Pétain then moved the capital to Vichy, rolled back
many of the liberal reforms of the French Third Republic, and assisted
Nazi Germany throughout World War II. After the war, Pétain was
convicted of treason, stripped of his military rank, and sentenced to
death. However, due to Pétain’s advanced age and role in World War I,
French President Charles de Gaulle commuted his sentence to life in
prison. Pétain died in 1951, at the age of 95.
Vidkun Quisling: This was another World War II Nazi
collaborator, although this time, the story takes place in Norway.
Unlike Pétain, though, Quisling’s role should come as no surprise as he
was the founder of the fascist political party, Nasjonal Samling
(National Gathering), which was modeled after Hitler’s Nazi party. When
Germany invaded Norway in April 1940, Quisling attempted a coup to
overthrow the Norwegian government. The coup failed, and Quisling had to
wait until the German occupation, which began in 1942, to take power.
However, that power was in name alone, as Quisling’s government was only
a puppet government of the Nazis, and very unpopular with the Norwegian
people. Quisling was eventually captured on May 9, 1945, and executed
on October 24, 1945. Today, Quisling’s name is synonymous with treason
and collaboration, as illustrated in Max Brooks’ zombie novel World War Z, in which human survivors who went insane and behaved like zombies were called “quislinqs.”
Marcus Junius Brutus: Before the rise of the Roman
Empire, there was the Roman Republic, whose principles are the basis of
almost every republic that has followed, including the United States.
The Roman Republic was based on the separation of powers, checks and
balances, and had a decentralized form of government. However, Julius
Caesar put an end to this with his reign, as he aimed to centralize the
government, by proclaiming himself dictator for life. The Senate,
alarmed at the turn of events, formed a conspiracy led by Brutus in
which they would assassinate Caesar in order to protect the republic.
Despite the fact that Caesar and Brutus were friends, Brutus led the
attack, which culminated in Julius Caesar’s assassination on March 15,
44 B.C. Although Caesar’s actual last words are unknown, an often quoted
line from William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is, “Et tu,
Brute? (even you, Brutus?). The Roman Republic subsequently sank into a
series of civil wars, which actually hastened the formation of the Roman
Empire (talk about the law of unintended consequences!) “What happened
to Brutus,” you ask? During one of the civil wars, Brutus raised an army
to capture Rome but was defeated. Knowing his fate, Brutus committed
suicide in October 42 B.C.
Judas Iscariot: Although Judas Iscariot did not
actually betray a head of state or his country, the term Judas has come
to be synonymous with traitor. Judas was friend of Jesus, and one of his
twelve disciples. As Jesus spread his message, he lost favor with the
Jewish high priests, who considered his teachings blasphemous. When they
finally decided to arrest him, it was nearly Passover, which the high
priests decided would be incredibly unpopular, so they decided he should
be arrested the night before Passover. The priests, knowing Judas’ love
of money, approached him and offered 30 pieces of silver if he would
deliver Jesus to them. Judas obliged, and led the arresting soldiers to
the Garden of Gethsemane, where Jesus and the rest of the disciples were
camped out. After the arrest, Judas was so riddled with guilt that he
returned the money and then hanged himself. Judas’ legacy would live
forever, though, as the word traitor literally means “one who delivers,”
as Judas delivered Jesus.
Benedict Arnold: What discussion of traitors would
be complete without a mention of Benedict Arnold? The most notorious of
American traitors, Arnold’s story actually begins with him as a
Revolutionary War hero. As a colonel, he led the Connecticut militia,
alongside Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain Boys, to the capture of
Fort Ticonderoga. Eventually, Arnold achieved the rank of general and
had a series of successes on the battlefield including the Battle of
Saratoga. Unfortunately, he felt his accomplishments were overlooked by
the Continental Congress, and that his contemporaries stole credit for
his achievements. Fed up with how things were going, Arnold agreed to
surrender West Point to the British in 1780, but the plot was exposed
before it could be carried out. Arnold managed to elude capture, and was
welcomed with open arms and given a commission of brigadier general by
the British. He subsequently fought against the revolutionaries, and
even had some successes against them, but his military career was cut
short after the British surrender at Yorktown in 1781. After the war,
Arnold moved to Canada, and later to London. When he died in 1801,
Arnold was given a state funeral without military honors. For this
reason, Arnold’s place in history is somewhat ambiguous; he is
considered a hero in Britain, and the vilest of all traitors in America.
To respond to your article about treason act ,did Sihanouk .Pol Pot, Hun Sen. Chea Sim , Heng Sam Rin or Var Kim Hong feed to this description or not ? You can tell me . Sihanouk leader in 1966- 1967 allowed Yuon army of more than 50,000 station deep inside Khmer territorial , feed them, arm them well better than his own Khmer troop . After the revolution in 1975 ,he himself went to china met with Yuon and Chen and declare war with Cambodian people who deposed him from power and order foreign troop Yuon of 50,000 plus turn weapon support by him to attack Khmer country .Did that feed to that description of treason or not ? Talk a bout Pol Pot and his communist Khmer Rum Dos created by called from Sihanouk to joint and fight with Khmer revolution who dare to chase enemy Yuon out of Khmer territorial , After the war end in 1975 ,they got drunk with victory and set up a slaughter regime to killed their own innocent citizen by colluding with Sihanouk and Yuon behind the scene to kill of millions Khmer life .did that can feed with your description of treason or not ? Hun Sen ,Chea Sim ,Heng Sam Rin all remnant of communist Khmer Rum Dos Joint with Yuon force to deliberate Khmer from dictator communist , that action we Khmer fairly said to save Khmer life .But after deliberation ,these former communist Khmer commit traitors , allowed Yuon hiding hundred of thousand troop inside Khmer land, allow enemy Yuon to control Khmer administration and border land, encroachment and took a way our farm land , villages even pagoda . they also start to create a new scheme call land concession for economic ,and give more land to enemy control ,ignore or enforce brutally any complain from Khmer owner who lost their farming land to this vicious scheme . Did that resonate to the treason criteria or not ? Var Kim Hong Yuon origin install by Yuon patron of this administration to take care the border demarcation , he allowed Yuon to encroached our border and refuse to recognize and protect our territories , not just that in front of Khmer demand for stop and verify yuon invader , he stand and protect enemy by give a fake evident or legalize Yuon violation ,by accepted rightfulness of Yuon encroachment action . did these acknowledgement of Yuon penetration is an act or treason or not ? You are Khmer decide it .
ReplyDelete