Paris Peace Accords 23 Oct. 1991

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

[Vietnamization] Logging’s roots deep

“[T]he revenues of this operation [were] at least $500,000 [per] day of milled timber; all removed on the company’s own private road, straight to Vietnam … or $1.5 billion in total,”
 Tree trunks lie in a section of cleared forest in Mondulkiri’s Keo Seima
Tree trunks lie in a section of cleared forest in Mondulkiri’s Keo Seima district last year near an ELC owned by Binh Phuok Kratie Rubber 2 Company. Heng Chivoan

Logging’s roots deep

Hun Sen’s Cambodia has been shaped by the collection of illegal timber dollars, profiting a politically connected elite and in turn ensuring the ruling party’s grip on the state apparatus, a leading Australian researcher has said.

Sarah Milne, a research fellow at the Australian National University, in a study published last month in the journal Critical Asian Studies, said the Cambodian “regime” has created a “timber shadow economy” by embracing foreign investment, which is “carefully controlled and maximised by the state … in collaboration with powerful elites”.

Milne’s research, based on more than four years of field work in Cambodia, uses the examples of three local subsidiaries of state-owned Vietnam Rubber Group (VRG) in Kratie and Mondulkiri provinces, and tycoon Try Pheap’s concession to clear the China-backed Stung Atai hydropower dam reservoir, to argue that networks of powerful and connected individuals have for years siphoned off money that should have been spent on the country’s development.

“Cambodia’s regime has been likened to a shadow state, given the role illicit logging rents played during the period of post-conflict transition and modern-day state formation,” she writes.

“This enabled provincial strongmen to operate like warlords, controlling logging in order to finance their personal wealth and maintain their troops,” which in turn led to the formalisation of the system as many of these “warlords” went on to assume positions in the ruling Cambodian People’s Party, she argues.

An informal “taxation” system arose, which was intended to supplement the wages of officials, as legislation was passed that effectively allowed the state to re-privatise or capitalise on public land following the banning of logging concessions in 2001.


Milne, who has conducted extensive independent research in the area, said officials had told her it was “impossible to control the reservoir-clearing activities”, while NGOs reported that the “logging operation . . . cover[ed] an area of approximately 200,000 hectares”.

Military police were hired to protect the smuggling routes to Vietnam, and Pheap’s firm, MDS Import Export, confiscated any timber harvested by others and intimidated unsanctioned loggers, while Forestry Administration officials told Milne that MDS’s rights to log extended to “everything in Pursat province”.

“[B]y the time MDS had trafficked the rosewood to the Vietnamese border – using a police-protected and Forestry Administration-facilitated fleet of Lexus, Land Cruiser, and Range Rover four-wheel drive vehicles – the price per cubic meter was marked up by five times [to upwards of $25,000].”
Chheng Kimsun, director of the Forestry Administration, could not be reached yesterday.

As Pheap has allegedly become one of the major financiers of the CPP, and is also an official sponsor of at least three military battalions in the northeast [bordering Vietnam], where he also has significant business interests, Milne writes that officials report “his activities involve ‘everyone’s bowl of rice’: he is ‘untouchable’ because of his high-level connections and because no one is willing to bite the hand that feeds”.

“[A]s Try Pheap’s contribution to the state and the party expands, so must his business portfolio. Indeed, it seems as though the two are locked into a mutual ratchet effect.”

A spokesman for MDS Import Export could not be reached.

In Mondulkiri and Kratie provinces, Milne’s investigations into VRG’s three plantations produced yet more evidence of this symbiotic relationship between foreign investors, powerful tycoons and illegal logging.

The stripping of thousands of hectares of timber in the concessions was led by two businessmen who are said to be related to Hun Sen – Oknha Ol, who informants told Milne is the godson of Hun Sen’s brother, Hun Neng; and Oknha Tai, who had the rights to Kratie.

“But unlike Try Pheap, these tycoons had managed to keep extremely low profiles. 

For example, in 2013 when hundreds of villagers tried collectively to take [Oknha] Ol to court for stealing their resin trees, the provincial judge dismissed their case because no one knew the tycoon’s full name or address.”

“[T]he revenues of this operation [were] at least $500,000 [per] day of milled timber; all removed on the company’s own private road, straight to Vietnam … or $1.5 billion in total,” Milne writes. “Once the forested land is gone and legitimacy has waned, then Hun Sen’s Cambodia may well be trapped in a cage, forced to consume its very own sources of power.”

“Whereas logging revenue in the 1990s was the salve that ensured Cambodia’s transition to peace, today it is the gel that holds the regime together.”

Phay Siphan, spokesman for the Council of Ministers, yesterday dismissed the study’s findings, saying the rich were being taxed appropriately and foreign investors would have been scared off if such a “shadow economy” existed.

“We see the health of the government. GDP has increased and aid and investors are assured to be in Cambodia,” he said. “Now investors don’t need to go to personal pockets. It’s a little bit transparent now.…Opportunists always take advantage of the system. But as a whole, the nation overall is very good.”

“The middle class has grown, and all the rich are supporting the nation and we take tax from them.”



1 comment:

  1. As a Khmer man i am so worry about this deforestation in my native country Cambodia . The scheme of the so call land concession for economic purpose is an easy term to accepted , because spiritually they just want to create and build progress system to elevate their poor country and raise quota of improvement to their citizen . The question i ask you as Khmer nation, who idea of this scheme come from? did Hun Sen a 7 or 8 grade education have that much ingenuity or inter intellectual that high to making up this proposal ? I have plenty of doubted, and suspicious ? Yuon patron behind the scene with good colonial experient plan may involved in secret to develop this scheme . First they want to dissect our land in parcel and give full authority to their control companies for 99 years lease ( this lease agreement mean free for 99 years of control ) to abolished the ownership right from Khmer . Second they have plan to develop and colonized that land take full access and start to send their citizen colon to occupy this land in the so call company employees or workers . Third the cronies stupid slave government can earn wealth by destroying his own nature treasure . You can see Khmer administration of to day turned them self to be a stupid coolies of Viet to devastating their own forest in exchange their ranking and power . Fourth they have a long and macho strategic plan to pushed Khmer poor farmers in two distinct ways . A physically unable to survive, cause by lack access of big land enough to sustain their families survival. B - they destroy Khmer mentality in a precise manner by keep busy,for their staple in one part and another part fight with their own power government to avoid the unlawful scheme of confiscate land by power , third to keep their mentality occupy and worry about their own personal business and neglect of the enemy invasion on the big scale . I give you and example like Prey Lang ,we Khmer just busy protect the forest for their live staple ,Yuon and Hun sen traitor allowed Yuon build row and row of good and well organize house behind your front line . Did this is a well organize scheme or what else you can say ? C- This government and their families cronies have free hand support by judge and legal system ,destroy our Khmer forest for thousand of years in the immense scale unimaginable and sale to their boss Vietnam at a cheap price possible . This government blink their eyes, lax all their enforcement protection and let the corrupt scheme in the country shoot to the roof . This influential bribe under the nose of Khmer official in all level from top to bottom tear cause a lot of distrust and infuriate in the eyes of Khmer popular . Cooperation well coordinate between government and Khmer rural society become irrelevant fact in this 30years plus period , The dear friends of high authority with a lot of favoritism and influential in their government cycle set up a big untouchable enterprise totally control exclusively clandestine business of unbreakable bond to furnish cash flow to the government . Those who get rich easily by corruption turned to be a diehard supporter of the regime and be a vicious fanatic in protecting this fascist regime at all cost . Remember our old Khmer said the more money they have , more power they get , They can buy rank ,justice, position ,or abolish all criminal act and control this poor Khmer societies at their will .

    ReplyDelete