Financial Times | 13 August 2015
Billionaire is the only 69-year-old white guy in the US who lives like a rap star, says Jacob Weisberg
©Ingram Pinn
After every loutish performance, political analysts pronounce Donald Trump’s presidential bid finally dead.
Surely he cannot recover, they insist, from libelling all Mexicans,
denigrating the military heroism of Senator John McCain or making crude insinuations about the popular Fox News host Megyn Kelly. But somehow, his predicted demise fails to materialise. Instead, new polls
appear showing the billionaire property mogul to be more popular than
ever. By most measures, Mr Trump now leads the Republican field by a
substantial margin.
What could possibly be the attraction of this puffed-up billionaire buffoon?
The first thing to say about the Trump phenomenon is that a mutually
gratifying symbiosis with the press drives his popularity. Polls at this
stage in the election cycle essentially track how much news coverage a
candidate receives. Media attention propels Mr Trump’s numbers, and his
numbers justify more coverage. His candidacy makes the primaries into a
remunerative and enjoyable story, even though everyone knows it is
guaranteed to fall to pieces by the time the primaries get fully rolling
in February.
But
being a non-viable choice does not mean that Mr Trump is not going to
affect the outcome of the presidential race. Pat Buchanan, another
unelectable Republican protest candidate, arguably cost President George
HW Bush re-election in 1992. And should he choose to run as a
third-party candidate after being denied the nomination, Mr Trump would
more or less guarantee victory for Hillary Clinton, the presumptive
Democratic nominee, much in the way that Ralph Nader cost Al Gore the
presidency in 2000.
[The Cambodian analogy to Trump, Nader et al is the idiotic new party of Kem Ley, Yeng Virak and their likes.]
But Mr Trump is not merely a clown stumbling into a drama and playing
it for laughs. His success speaks to two species of resentment that
appear intermittently in American political life. The first is
xenophobia. The men who are perhaps the most plausible Republican
nominees, Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, identify with or as Latinos and
appreciate that their party faces a dim future without them. Mr Trump,
who crashed the gate without an invitation, could not care less what
happens to the party. This frees him to insult Mexicans as rapists and
drug dealers, slandering not only illegal immigrants but all Hispanics.
Americans who share his prejudice against foreigners have no other
advocate who speaks so openly.
The
second form of resentment Mr Trump channels concerns social class. The
last effective exponent of this political undercurrent was Sarah Palin,
before she quit her job as governor of Alaska to make money as a
celebrity. What is curious about the Palin-Trump style of cultural
populism is that it has little to do with the growing economic
disparities in American life. The resented betters are social elites in
the media, politics and Hollywood, whom less educated,
lower-middle-class Americans regard as behaving in a condescending or
hypocritical way.
By contrast, Mr Trump’s relationship to his own wealth conveys an
honesty that his followers say they like. Though he built his empire out
of his father’s empire, he has never suffered from the sense of decorum
or noblesse oblige that sometimes accompany inherited money. His style
is not even nouveau riche so much as it is last-week-lottery-winner. To
Mr Trump, being a billionaire means plating everything in gold and
slapping his name everywhere in huge block letters. It means that he
gets to say whatever pops into his head and never has to say he is
sorry. His celebrity “brand” is an alpha-male fantasy of wealth and
power, revolving around the pleasure he takes in firing and suing people
who displease him. He is the only 69-year-old white guy in America who
gets to live like a rap star.
Rather than creating envy, the public role Mr Trump enacts validates
the aspirations of his admirers. His popularity is an expression of
reverse identity politics, which turns white males from defendants into
plaintiffs in the contest of victims. He and his followers fixate on
political correctness that disallows their grievances about the social
transformation under way. His braggadocio and misogyny speak to male
privilege lost. His male supporters regard his crude sexism not as
juvenile behaviour but as a transgressive political statement.
In all of this, Mr Trump’s closest point of comparison is less to any
previous American politician than to Silvio Berlusconi in Italy. Both
boast about their wealth, their brilliance and the beautiful women they
attract. The key difference is that Mr Trump does not take himself all
that seriously as a demagogue, lacking the self-discipline and
long-range calculation. He is essentially a narcissist taking his ego
out for a joyride. It will not last for ever, so enjoy the trip.
The writer is chairman and editor-in-chief of The Slate Group and author of ‘The Bush Tragedy’
No comments:
Post a Comment