News Analysis
With Aung San Suu Kyi’s Rise, China and Myanmar Face New Relationship
International New York Times | 12 November 2015
BEIJING — Even though China has long supported the generals who have wielded most of the power in Myanmar, the government in Beijing prepared this year for the possible election victory of the opposition leader, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, by inviting her to the capital to meet with President Xi Jinping.
In
the June visit, Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi was polite, paid deference to
China as an important country and did not live up to fears that she
might refer to democratic principles or her fellow Nobel Peace laureate,
Liu Xiaobo, the Chinese writer who is serving 11 years in prison.
But
whether China, which deftly read the pre-election tea leaves, can
arrange a new relationship with Myanmar under the newly elected
government is another matter.
Among
ordinary people in Myanmar, China is seen as a heavy-handed northern
neighbor largely interested in extracting valuable natural resources
like timber and jade — and prone to plundering the land to build
pipelines and a vast hydroelectric dam at Myitsone on the Irrawaddy River.
Even
Myanmar’s military-dominated government has not done China many favors.
It canceled the building of the partly constructed dam, and to the
annoyance of Beijing, it has in the past four years turned increasingly
toward the United States.
As
of Thursday, Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi’s party, the National League for
Democracy, had won 291 seats of the 491 contested in the election, with
results still trickling in. The governing party has won 33.
In
response, Myanmar’s foreign minister, U Wunna Maung Lwin, who met with
Mr. Wang in southern China on Wednesday, said that Myanmar would
maintain its friendly stance toward China.
Beneath the diplomatic courtesies of the two foreign ministers lies an awkward situation for China.
Myanmar,
also known as Burma, has traditionally hewed to a neutral, nonaligned
foreign policy. That changed under the brunt of more than two decades of
economic sanctions from the United States and other Western countries,
forcing Myanmar to tilt closer to Beijing.
However,
since 2011, the military-dominated government has turned toward the
United States, although falling far short of embracing Washington’s
demands on improving human rights and ending war against ethnic rebels.
The
shift away from China came after some particularly heavy-handed tactics
from Beijing — including the unpopular plans for the dam — and the
contrasting appeal of the West. Myanmar indicated it did not want
business as usual with Beijing.
President
Obama has visited Myanmar twice; Mr. Xi, perhaps China’s best-traveled
leader, has not been there since assuming office in 2012, a telling sign
of the cool relations.
“China
may feel that Myanmar has not shown the kind of respect it deserves,
and that the current government has become too close to the West,” said
Thant Myint-U, author of “Where China Meets India: Burma and the New
Crossroads of Asia.”
The
new government, he said, would most likely seek improved relations all
around, including with the United States, and especially with China, its
large and wealthy neighbor.
In
the last year, China has been disappointed that Myanmar has not shown
more enthusiasm for its new infrastructure initiative, called “One Belt,
One Road,” which encompasses the financing of railroads, roads and
pipelines that would connect China with most of the globe via Southeast
Asia and Central Asia.
Instead
of viewing the program as a boost for its underdeveloped economy, Mr.
Thant said, Myanmar has viewed the Chinese overtures as infringements on
its northern border with China.
“There
has been a longstanding reluctance by Myanmar to open up its borders —
there are a mix of security concerns, inertia and more excitement about
developing relations with the rest of the world,” he said.
Most
recently, China proved to be unhelpful to Myanmar’s government by
derailing a nationwide cease-fire among a mix of ethnic rebel groups.
Leaders in the nominally civilian but military-dominated leadership of
Myanmar had backed the deal in an effort to end decades of conflict in
the north of the country and to improve its prospects in the recent
elections.
China
has long supported two of the rebel groups, the United Wa State Army
and the Kachin Independence Organization, as a way of retaining
influence in the northern part of Myanmar and keeping illicit timber and
jade flowing across the border into the southern province of Yunnan.
Militia and criminal networks move freely between the two countries
while trafficking in narcotics, minerals and animals.
Last
month, the Wa and Kachin fighters refused to sign a cease-fire
agreement involving a range of rebel groups. Western diplomats in
Myanmar said that China had pushed the two groups to stay out of the
deal as a way to keep leverage over whoever gained power in the
elections. China’s Foreign Ministry denied that the two rebel groups had
acted on instructions from Beijing.
During the election campaigning in Myanmar, foreign affairs were rarely mentioned, and China was not an issue.
Although
Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi was diplomatic during her June visit, she is not
popular or trusted among the Chinese leadership, one Chinese expert on
Myanmar said.
“China
does not like her, and there are reasons,” said Lin Xixing, a professor
at Jinan University in Guangdong Province in southern China. “Her
father helped the Japanese fight the Chinese military in World War II.
She has been close to the West, grew up in India and married a foreigner
in Europe.”
Even
so, the Chinese leadership may be inclined to take a pragmatic view of
the relationship. More than anything else, Myanmar needs economic
growth, and China is best positioned to provide it, Mr. Lin said.
Moreover, he added, she had become more of a politician and less of an
idealist.
“She
has to fix ties with China because she needs the economy to work,” Mr.
Lin said. “Those who voted for her are poor people, and they won’t have
any patience with her if she screws up the economy.”
No comments:
Post a Comment