Paris Peace Accords 23 Oct. 1991

Saturday, January 7, 2017

REPOST [Vietnamization] January 7, 1979 is Frankenstein of April 17, 1975

JANUARY 7, 1979, IS FRANKENSTEIN OF APRIL 17, 1975

Image may contain: 2 people
Sam Rainsy (4-years of exile or face imprisonment / assassination for pulling illegal border posts on Srey Meas's farmland in Svay Rieng);
Srey Meas (pictured here with her hus
band at Sam Rainsy's house in 2013) who was prosecuted, put in prison for complaining of Vietnamese encroachment onto her farmland);
-SRP Senator Hong Sok Huor, currently in priso
n for publicly discussing border issues and maps to evade Hun Sen's arrest warrant on charges of treason (Photo: Aug. 2013)
JANUARY 7, 1979, IS FRANKENSTEIN OF APRIL 17, 1975
Sam Rainsy's letter published in
The Cambodia Daily, January 1, 2009

On January 7, 1979, I was living in France and publishing a monthly anti-Khmer Rouge bulletin named Sereika (meaning Liberation).

When the Vietnamese communist army invaded Cambodia to "free" us from the Khmer Rouge, we quickly realized that we were caught between Scylla and Charybdis.

We remembered what happened to most Eastern and Central European countries after Stalin's Red Army had invaded them to "free" them from the Nazis.

According to the Vietnamese-installed regime's propaganda, without January 7, 1979 we would not have been able to achieve anything that we have achieved since. Or, in other words, nothing would have grown around us without our salvation by Vietnam and its (mainly symbolic) auxiliary forces led by the CPP's current leaders.

But it is worth realizing that without April 17, 1975 (the date of the Khmer Rouge takeover and the beginning of the Cambodian genocide), there would be no need for January 7, 1979. And without the Vietnamese and Chinese communist massive intervention in the early 1970s to help the Khmer Rouge, the latter would not have been able to seize power and there would be no April 17, 1975.

Therefore April 17 and January 7 are inextricably associated: both of them are communist Frankensteins. Celebrating January 7 without having in mind a broader historical perspective, is playing into the hands of the current Phnom Penh regime whose only raison d'être was to "free" the Cambodian people from the Khmer Rouge with communist Vietnam's decisive but not unselfish help.

It is sad to see most former leaders of the anti-Vietnamese Resistance in the 1980s, especially from Funcinpec, give up their ideal to fight for a free, democratic and independent Cambodia.

It is heartbreaking to see them sell out to the CPP, thus forgetting the memories of all those who have died for this ideal.

Sam Rainsy

14 comments:

  1. Anonymous9:19 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10:06 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:29 AM

      This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous10:53 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:45 PM

      This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous1:48 PM

    12:45 PM

    Expansionist Ho double crossed Pol Pot.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous2:47 AM

    We thank you, Dear Theary for
    deleting Yuon's trolls.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous5:00 PM

    Typical reaction. When someone pointed out what you can't answer, delete them.

    'According to the Vietnamese-installed regime's propaganda, without January 7, 1979 we would not have been able to achieve anything that we have achieved since'
    Isn't it the true? Or some of you prefer to live and die under Khmer Rogue?

    'without April 17, 1975'
    If we're going to with 'without' games like this we can continue till 'without human then this world would be better', right? Oh and if Mr Rainsy is so keen on this 'without' game then I say this

    WITHOUT Khmer Rogue's invasion of Vietnam in the first place and slaughtered almost hundred thousands of Vietnamese (those in doubt pls gg the word 'Ba Chuc' http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/07/opinion/meanwhile-when-the-khmer-rouge-came-to-kill-in-vietnam.html . Beside pls remember that only a week after the fall of Saigon or more exactly 4/5/1975 Khmer Rogue illegally seized Phu Quoc island and massacred Vietnamese there, this particular event was commonly used by some Cambodian to fabricate Cambodia's claim of said island) then Vietnam may not intervened

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:24 AM

      Dear Vietcong Friend @5:00PM,

      Please go home to Hanoi!!!

      Delete
  7. Anonymous9:30 PM

    The UN had planned to intervene in Cambodia on January 15th 1979. The evil Yuon knew that UN's intention, so the evil Yuon invaded Cambodia to cover its killings of Khmer people through its brainwashed Khmer Vietminh.

    Therefore, Vietnam invaded Cambodia on January 7th 1979 to stop the UN from helping Cambodia.
    Vietnam played the role of killers and rescuers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:03 PM

      'The UN had planned to intervene in Cambodia on January 15th 1979. '
      Source pls. Beside if the useless UN do want to deal with Pol Pot then why they kept Khmer Rogue's seat long after Vietnamese intervention (which exposed the true genocide) and supported them?

      'Therefore, Vietnam invaded Cambodia on January 7th 1979 to stop the UN from helping Cambodia.'
      Sorry pal, that campaign took about 2 months or so not in a single day

      'so the evil Yuon invaded Cambodia to cover its killings of Khmer people through its brainwashed Khmer Vietminh.'
      So may you provide source for your claim?
      Beside are you going to say all the cross border killing of Vietnamese from 1975 - 1979 were conducted by Vietnamese?

      Some tend to blame Vietnamese for everything but always ignored all the raiding initiated by Khmer Rogue into Vietnam's territories right? Yet again I ask what about all those raiding and killing?

      Can anyone here answer?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:07 AM

      Anonymous 11:03 PM,
      " Some tend to blame Vietnamese for everything but always ignored all the raiding initiated by Khmer Rogue into Vietnam's territories right? Yet again I ask what about all those raiding and killing?
      Can anyone here answer? "
      ------------------
      I hear you !!! You get a few ounces of my sympathy !!!
      I think that if Champa still exist as a buffer state between Vietnam and Cambodia, the Khmer and the Viet would not have direct conflicts which lead to wars with each other.
      But somehow Champa just disappeared !!!
      Evidently, there was one aggressive nation that swallowed Champa then kept invade, conquer southward and westward up till nowadays.
      Don't you think like I do that,it's about time this aggressive expansionist should stop committing crimes and let Khmer and Viet live side by side happily together ??? !!!
      But waite,make sure you hear me correctly !!! Living side by side, together does not imply that living in the Federation of Indochina under the domination of that nasty nation !!!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous9:52 AM

      I think that if Champa still exist as a buffer state between Vietnam and Cambodia, the Khmer and the Viet would not have direct conflicts which lead to wars with each other.
      ---------------------
      I don't think so because Cambodia did used Champa as a staging point to invade the ancient Dai Viet, respectively in 1128 Suryavaraman II led an army of 20000 men to invade Nghe An on land and later sent a fleet of roughly 500-700 ships to raid along the Gulf of Tonkin. Of course he did that after suppressed the Cham and his continuous failure made the Cham broke the alliance with Khmer Empire.

      ----------------
      But somehow Champa just disappeared !!!
      ----------------
      Kingdoms and empires emerged and fall throughout the history of mankind

      -----------------
      Evidently, there was one aggressive nation that swallowed Champa then kept invade, conquer southward and westward up till nowadays.
      -----------------
      The story told by some Cambodian about Vietnamese simply 'swallowed' the 'peace loving, weak and poor Champa' and used it as a symbol of Vietnamese expansionism is an over simplified history. There're no white knight or black demon here my friend because Khmer Empire did contributed significantly for Champa demise. Beside the Cham was not that 'hapless or peaceful' because they did sacked both Thang Long (Daiviet's capital) and Angkor (Khmer Empire's capital). In turn both empires also sacked Champa's capitals. The triple conflict between Daiviet, Khmer Empire and Champa was a struggle between the equal not a kind of one side aggressive invasion some used to 'portray Vietnamese expansionism'

      ---------------
      Federation of Indochina under the domination of that nasty nation !!!
      ---------------
      That nasty nation you're mentioning about was France isn't it? Say the concept of Indochina was created and used by the French colonists.


      Anyway I'm quite glad that someone do share some 'sympathy' here yet you ignored (unintentionally I hope?) the question you quoted. May you answer those questions and stop go off-topic then?

      Delete
  8. Anonymous9:29 AM

    I will go to other forums and punish the Khmer so that the blog admins here will regret for deleting my posts.

    ReplyDelete