Another example is Cambodia. Ever since the government introduced the so-called "Cyber War Team" last year, there has been an upsurge in the number of criminal charges related to comments made on the Internet. For instance, a student was arrested in August after writing on Facebook that he planned to initiate a "color revolution".
Amnesty decries growing intolerance towards dissent in Asia
Deutsche Welle | 24 February 2016
Political activists imprisoned in Malaysia, secular bloggers hacked to
death in Bangladesh, human rights lawyers detained in China - Amnesty
International's latest annual report says repression in Asia is on the
rise.
"Your rights are in jeopardy," warned Amnesty International (AI) as it
launched its annual assessment of human rights around the world. "Not
only are our rights under threat, so are the laws and the system that
protect them," said AI's Secretary General Salil Shetty.
Released on Wednesday, February 24, the 400-page report provides an
overview of the rights situation in 160 countries in 2015. The authors
claim that there is a global trend of undermining human rights, which
has come from governments "deliberately attacking, underfunding or
neglecting institutions that have been set up to help protect our
rights."
China enacted a controversial national security law last year, which critics say could be used to further suppress
rights defenders
In this context, the situation in the Asia Pacific is
particularly bleak as repression of dissent has become an "alarming and
intensifying trend" in the region, Champa Patel, AI director for South
and Southeast Asia, told DW, adding that the very people fighting to
uphold the rights governments are meant to protect have come under
sustained attack in several Asian countries.
Lack of accountability
The states' failure to ensure accountability along with a sense of
widespread impunity remain the drivers of human rights violations in
these countries. For instance, in Thailand - which has been ruled by a
military junta since mid-2014 - authorities abused the judicial system
to stamp out peaceful dissent or criticism, the report pointed out.
Students, journalists and academics were arbitrarily arrested and held
in secret detention.
The massive crackdown against human rights lawyers in China is another
example. Since last July, Chinese authorities have arrested over 200
lawyers and activists, who were questioned and detained, while many of
their offices and homes were raided.
Legal and constitutional reforms
Besides arbitrary arrests, intimidation and harassment, many
governments in the Asia Pacific also introduced legislation claiming to
ensure "national security," which rights groups criticize as a means by
the authorities to silence dissent.
In Malaysia, the Sedition Act was amended last year, with the scope of
offences increased to cover electronic media. The amendment also allows
for tougher penalties such as mandatory and increased prison sentences.
The report says that at least 15 people were charged under the Act over
the past year, including political cartoonist Zulkiflee Anwar Haque.
"The Sedition Act is a colonial era relic that gives the authorities
sweeping powers to crack down on any 'inconvenient' individuals, and it
must be repealed immediately," said AI's Patel.
In China, the criminal charge of "picking quarrels and provoking
troubles" continued to be used to arrest and detain political activists,
lawyers and worker rights advocates.
Five women's rights activists were arrested under this charge in March
because of their plan to launch a campaign against sexual harassment. In
December, prominent lawyer Pu Zhiqiang was put on trial for the same
reason. Also charged with "inciting ethnic hatred" in connection with
comments he made on social media, the lawyer was given a three-year
suspended sentence.
Beijing also enacted a controversial national security law in July,
which comprises areas such as politics, culture and finance. Critics
point out that some of the charges included in the law such as
separatism, inciting subversion and leaking state secrets - a charge
which led to the conviction of former DW journalist Gao Yu in April -
could be used to further suppress rights defenders.
Online criticism
And as AI indicates, these charges are also aimed at deterring online
rights activism, a move that has gained momentum in recent years in the
Asia Pacific. In this context, Patel points to China's draft Cyber
Security Law as a means to crack down on online criticism of the
authorities. "It contains vague and imprecise terms such as 'upset
social order' and 'harm national security', which could be used to
further restrict freedom of expression," he told DW.
But such repression is not limited to China. In Thailand, the AI report
says, authorities penalized scores of individuals for publishing
comments on Facebook deemed to be insulting to the monarch. Some of
these individuals were reportedly sentenced to up to 60 years in jail.
Another example is Cambodia. Ever since the government introduced the
so-called "Cyber War Team" last year, there has been an upsurge in the
number of criminal charges related to comments made on the Internet. For
instance, a student was arrested in August after writing on Facebook
that he planned to initiate a "color revolution".
Bangladesh
Moreover, the report accused some governments, such as that in
Bangladesh, of failing to provide adequate protection for citizens'
freedom of expression.
"Bangladesh has become increasingly dangerous for those
speaking their own minds," said AI. In recent months, the South Asian
nation has seen a number of attacks on bloggers and publishers carried
out by suspected religious fundamentalists.
In 2015, for instance, a total of four atheist bloggers were killed for
their writings criticizing Islam, leading rights groups to slam the
Bangladeshi authorities for what they view as a "passivity" which has
"fostered a climate of impunity that is extremely dangerous for
citizen-journalists."
Patel also warned of Dhaka's plans to push through legislation which, if
passed, would alarmingly increase the government's control of the NGO
sector.
No comments:
Post a Comment