Opposition lawmakers spend more time in provinces, out of danger
CNRP lawmakers spent more time out in the provinces last year, a
fact that government watchdog Comfrel chalks up, at least in part, to
threats and harassment from the ruling Cambodian People’s Party keeping
them out of the National Assembly.
Subjected to what was widely perceived as state-backed persecution,
the Cambodia National Rescue Party last year saw two of its lawmakers bashed outside parliament; its deputy leader, Kem Sokha, dismissed as the assembly’s first vice president; and its president, Sam Rainsy, forced into self-imposed exile to avoid prison.
Released yesterday, Comfrel’s annual National Assembly and
Parliamentarian Watch report draws a link between the crackdown and the
CNRP’s eagerness to hit the road, finding the removal of the
opposition’s top brass from the parliament, and the party’s ensuing
boycott, left “little work to be done” at the assembly.
Looking at the numbers, 42 CNRP lawmakers made 774 field trips, while
49 CPP parliamentarians made just 230, with the report noting that some
ruling party MPs neglected their duties on the assumption government
officials would cover for them.
Attending the report’s launch, CNRP lawmaker Ou Chanrith said the
judiciary’s lack of independence left opposition MPs vulnerable.
“We have immunity, legal protection, but the court system doesn’t
implement the law effectively; there’s a chance people will use violence
against us, and that frightens CNRP lawmakers,” Chanrith said.
Justice Ministry spokesman Chin Malin declined to comment on the
report, but dismissed claims opposition party members were at risk. “If
there is abuse against MPs . . . the perpetrators will not escape,” he
said, noting that three men had been arrested for the attack on CNRP parliamentarians Nhay Chamroeun and Kong Saphea.
Several men can be seen participating in the beating on October 26.
Kem Chhorn, who runs Comfrel’s monitoring program, said the
authorities must protect all lawmakers to allow them to do their work.
In other findings, the watchdog’s team found more lawmakers expressed
their opinions during plenary sessions last year, which covered 25
agenda items.
But though the time spent debating increased by about eight hours,
the quality of debate was still lacking. The report singled out the
election reform package – including the law establishing the National
Election Committee and laws regulating national and commune elections –
as a case in point.
“The three aforementioned laws were passed over without any debate on its (sic) legal essence.”
No comments:
Post a Comment