Banteay Chhmar, protecting Cambodia's 'second Angkor'
Nikkei Asian Review | 22 March 2016
SIEM REAP PROVINCE, Cambodia -- Sunset approaches at
one of the world's greatest, man-made wonders. Soft light burnishes
the weathered stones, the images of gods and kings. It's party time at
Cambodia's Angkorian temples.
Backpackers, beer cans
in hand, queue up to wedge into the crowd atop Bakheng, a sacred hill
which affords spectacular views of that jewel in the crown, Angkor Wat.
And around its vast moat, a seamless motorcade circles, wreathing the
edifice with exhaust fumes. In brief, Angkor is being besieged by mass
tourism.
Some 170 kilometers to the northwest lies Banteay Chhmar, another
grand edifice from the glory days of the ancient Khmer empire, and while
it is often called "the second Angkor" it could not be more removed
from the crowds and blighted atmosphere around Cambodia's most exalted
temple. So far, that is.
At this remote 13th century complex, only the rustle of falling
leaves, birdsong and distant music are heard, with just an occasional
visitor intruding. Jungle vines snake up leaning walls and massive tree
roots strangle collapsing shrines. Then suddenly, from a shadowy niche, a
curvaceous celestial dancer, an apsara, stops you in your tracks with a sensual smile cast over 800 years.
A mere 1,392 tourists entered this haunting precinct last year --
about as many as visit the main Angkor temples in less than three hours
every day. While there are more than 20,000 hotel and guesthouse rooms
available in Siem Reap, the mushrooming city near the Angkor temples,
the village of Banteay Chhmar can only host about 50 overnight guests at
nine humble homestays and two luxury tents.
Can Banteay Chhmar avoid invasion by mass tourism, and why has it not already been overwhelmed?
But build he did, and the results were magnificent. Measuring 770 by
690 meters, Banteay Chhmar is almost as extensive as Angkor Wat, its
538 meters of lifelike reliefs originally protected by colonnaded
galleries nearly twice as long as the better known ones at the Bayon
temple at Angkor. And like at the Bayon, "face towers," 37 of them, rise
in the inner precinct, with their mysterious, smiling faces carved into
the upper reaches that have been described by one archaeologist as a
wondrous bridge between sculpture and architecture.
Prey to
looters and the continual lashing by monsoon rains and invasive
vegetation, Banteay Chhmar finally commanded serious attention in 2007
when the U.S.-based Global Heritage Fund and Cambodia's Ministry of
Culture and Fine Arts targeted several areas of the temple for
restoration while simultaneously promoting low-impact tourism to avoid
the pitfalls of Angkor and improve the marginal livelihoods of
villagers.
Restoration efforts
A
prominent British conservation architect, John Sanday, headed a
60-member team which took apart, reassembled and shored up a section of
the eastern gallery that displays an epic in stone of ancient Khmer
life. The bas-relief depicts battles between the Khmer and their eastern
Cham neighbors, with charging elephants, soldiers about to be speared,
and crocodiles gobbling up the fallen. But there are also rare glimpses
into the daily lives of the common folk. With the help of
three-dimensional imaging to solve a complex jigsaw puzzle, the team
also put into place some 700 sandstone blocks, many of which had tumbled
down, to restore one of the tottering face towers.
Meanwhile
the villagers, with the help of non-government organizations such as
GHF, founded Banteay Chhmar Community-Based Tourism, an independent
group which is funneling 90% of tourism income to locals while trying to
ward off the industry's downsides.
The key guardian at the
gate is BCT head That Sophal, a son of rice farmers who survived the
Khmer Rouge and a village resident since 1993 when civil war still raged
in the area. With the Ministry of Culture, the BCT has forged an
agreement that bans hotels within the temple zone, an area of 7.8 square
kilometers established by royal decree. No outsiders are allowed to
build inside the zone, although resident villagers can remain but only
sell their property to others in the community.
That Sophal
is pleased with the modest but growing income flowing into the area via
locally organized cooking classes, dance performances, temple tours and
accommodations, ranging from $7 a night at one of the homestays to $800
for a luxury, air-conditioned tent and gourmet meals. The BCT last year
received $45,000 in direct income and the community also benefited in
indirect ways, but That Sophal is looking toward a cap on tourist
numbers.
"'I would like less than 10,000 tourists to Banteay Chhmar,"' he
told Nikkei Asian Review. "'If you get more than that you will lose
control. And if many tourists come so will the rich to build big hotels.
This is very dangerous."
GHF executive director Stefaan
Poortman says it is unlikely that tourism at Banteay Chhmar will ever
reach the scale of Angkor's. Whereas Angkor's main temples have been
significantly resurrected, only about a fifth of the original structure
at Banteay Chhmar remains intact, with wholesale restoration unlikely.
And despite a major road improvement last year, it still takes more than
two hours to travel there from the gateway of Siem Reap. But Poortman
is still uneasy.
"When you deal with a site of such
significance, in the long-term it is in the hands of the national
government. It would be very concerning if large scale development were
allowed," he said in a telephone interview from San Francisco. "I'm
still not yet confident that what the Cambodian government allowed to
happen at Angkor will not happen at Banteay Chhmar."
The rich and powerful, Cambodian and foreign, have through influence
and bribery flouted zoning regulations similar to those at Banteay
Chhmar, and they continue with unseemly developments in the Angkor area
while officials look the other way. Since the late King Norodom Sihanouk
launched an appeal to "Save Angkor" in 1989, endless international
conferences and management plans by United Nations Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization and others have attempted to
regulate tourism, protect the temples and ensure that surrounding
communities reaped benefits. But laissez-faire tourism appears to have
far outpaced the best laid plans, and that pace is accelerating: By
2020, 6-8 million annual visitors are projected, up from the current
number of more than 2 million, driven by such come-ons as the ranking by
guidebook publisher Lonely Planet last year of the Angkor temples as
the first of 500 "best attractions on the planet."
Some of
this influx at Angkor may spill over and breach the defenses of Banteay
Chhmar, which has also been nominated by the Cambodian government as a
Unesco World Heritage Site.
But for the time being, one can
clamber alone over a veritable sea of fallen stone, past leaning towers
and precariously perched arches, into a maze of sanctuaries where dark
corridors may lead to dead ends or a deity illuminated by skylight
piercing through ceiling cracks.
"I wanted to get lost
somewhere in Cambodia," said Gaelle Roussel, a young French tourist as
she stood admiring the eastern gallery reliefs. True to her mission, she
sought out the roads less traveled -- and found Banteay Chhmar.
No comments:
Post a Comment