[Vietnamization: Military, PRK, elections, Veng Sreng, 1997 coup] General Banh to ‘Smash Teeth’ of Opponents

[Background / related]

Vietnam, Cambodia "defence cooperation in order to...foil plots to weaken their relations" 

How Vietnam "foil plots" (democratic elections) to keep its CPP puppet in power in its destruction of Cambodia

Veng Sreng bloodletting sandwiched between Vietnam visits

VENG SRENG

...

General Banh to ‘Smash Teeth’ of Opponents

The Cambodia Daily | 17 May 2017

In the latest warning of violence and bloodshed from the ruling party, Defense Minister Tea Banh threatened on Sunday to “smash the teeth” of political opponents who demonstrate against the June 4 commune election results.

—Commune Election 2017—

Speaking at the opening of administrative buildings on the outskirts of Siem Reap City, General Banh appeared to invoke opposition protests in the wake of the disputed 2013 national election, vowing never to let similar demonstrations happen again.Defense Minister Tea Banh attends an inauguration ceremony at the National Defense University in Phnom Penh last year, in this photograph posted to his Facebook page.

“If they lose, but do not accept that loss, and come up with this or that demand—maybe soon we will smash their teeth,” he said. “I told you first.”

Gen. Banh took particular issue with protesters’ past calls for Prime Minister Hun Sen to leave office.

“To ask for change or stepping down, it will not happen anymore,” he said. “Please everyone, go together to vote for the Cambodian People’s Party.”

Reached on Tuesday, Gen. Banh reiterated the threat.

“What I am talking about with breaking the teeth, it means we will not allow chaos to happen again,” he said. “To protect public order, police, military police and military have to join together for the security for the country.”

The 1997 Law on the General Statute of Military Personnel of the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces says the army can help ensure public safety, assist citizens having difficulties or intercede “at the time of catastrophes,” but does not mention involvement in domestic protests.

That hasn’t stopped the general from regularly mentioning the protests in the years since, likening such activism to an opposition-led “color revolution” bent on overthrowing the government.

Mr. Hun Sen has also ramped up his customary pre-election rhetoric in recent weeks, saying that electoral defeat for his party would risk plunging the country back into civil war after years of CPP-backed peace.

Hang Puthea, spokesman for the National Election Committee, said on Tuesday that the NEC will investigate reports of politicians using threats, intimidation or violence during the two-week campaign period beginning on Saturday, but was powerless to do so before then.

“If, during the election campaign, there are threats that make people afraid, the local authorities have to inspect [them] or report to the NEC,” he said.

CNRP spokesman Yim Sovann denied any violent intentions from the opposition, saying his party sought tolerance and inclusion for the country “not to get up in the morning and talking about the war.”

“We want to build a democratic society with no violence,” he said.

Top CPP officials regularly issue statements about war and discord during election season, which are then disseminated via senior CPP officials who travel from Phnom Penh to party working group meetings in villages.

Keo Duong, a lecturer at the Royal University of Phnom Penh specializing in the history of the Khmer Rouge, said that while voters under 40 might not be won over by threats, survivors of the brutal 1970s regime may be receptive to the ruling party’s rhetoric.

Some victims say “they are satisfied for what they have now,” he said. “They don’t want something else like Western freedom of speech or something like this. They just want the status quo.”

Carl Thayer, an emeritus professor at the Australian Defense Force Academy in Canberra, said a large deployment of the military—rather than police—at protests was a quick way to convince anyone who remained defiant to CPP warnings.

The general’s comments showed that just as in 2013, there is no way the CPP would ever willingly give up power, Mr. Thayer said.

“All the signals are to threaten, dominate, and win the commune elections come hell or high water,” he said. “All the stops are out.”