The Gate Escape: A civil servant from the Natural Resources and Environment Ministry leaves the ministry by climbing over its gate as the People’s Democratic Reform Committee surrounds the premises yesterday.... 22 Jan. 2014, Bangkok Post |
Thai Court Says Delay of Elections Is Constitutional
BANGKOK
— A Thai court ruled Friday that a postponement of coming elections,
which protesters have worked feverishly to block, is lawful under the
country’s Constitution.
The
decision by the Constitutional Court was a blow to Prime Minister
Yingluck Shinawatra and surprised many legal scholars, who say there are
no provisions under Thai law for a delay.
Some
constitutional experts described the decision as a form of judicial
coup d’état because it could leave a power vacuum if elections were not
held.
An
aide to Ms. Yingluck said on Thai television that the government would
study the court’s decision. But he also seemed to leave the door open
for negotiations with opposition forces, especially the Democrat Party,
which is boycotting the elections.
Explaining
its decision, the court said in a short statement that the Constitution
“does not absolutely mandate that the election day cannot be
rescheduled.”
The
court listed circumstances that would justify delaying an election,
including acts of nature and situations that “obstruct the general
election process,” “damage the country” or cause “significant public
calamity.”
Thailand’s
Constitution requires that elections be held “not less than 45 days but
not more than 60 days from the day the House of Representatives has
been dissolved.”
The elections are scheduled for Feb. 2, a few days before the 60-day period expires.
Protesters
have blocked the registration of candidates in more than two dozen
districts and this week stopped the Election Commission from training
election workers in Bangkok.
The protest leader, Suthep Thaugsuban, has pledged to obstruct the elections at all costs.
“The great mass of people will block it in every way,” he said Thursday night.
Advance
voting begins Sunday, with about 2.2 million people registered to vote
early, compared with 2.7 million in the last election in 2011.
The
protest movement, which says it is fighting the dominance and
corruption of Ms. Yingluck and her family, draws the bulk of its support
from Bangkok and southern Thailand. The governing party, which has won
every election since 2001, has the backing of voters in the north and
northeast. Government supporters say that there has always been
corruption in Thailand and that the protesters simply want to seize
power.
A
nationwide opinion poll released Friday appeared to show that
protesters hold a minority view in their desire to block elections.
Nearly 80 percent of respondents to the poll said they intended to vote
if an election is held on Feb. 2.
In
answer to a separate question, just over 28 percent said there should
be “reforms before elections,” one of the main slogans of protesters,
who say they want the country ruled by an unelected “people’s council”
while largely unspecified changes are carried out.
The
telephone survey, which was conducted by Bangkok University, polled
1,018 respondents and had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus
four percentage points.
Ms.
Yingluck’s government faces the wrath not only of protesters but also
of hostile government agencies. The Election Commission, which requested
the judgment that the Constitutional Court issued Friday, has
repeatedly sought to postpone the elections. Somchai Srisutthiyakorn,
one of the commissioners, has argued that the elections could lead to violence and a military coup.
The
Constitutional Court has ruled against the government on several
crucial decisions in recent weeks and is perceived by government
supporters as highly political. In November, the court overturned a constitutional amendment
to make the Senate, the upper house of Parliament, a directly elected
body on the grounds that procures were not followed and that it was an
attempt to “overthrow” the democratic system.
In
analyzing Friday’s decision, Pornson Liengboonlertchai, a scholar at
Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok who specializes in constitutional
law, echoed the views of other experts in saying the court appeared to
be making law, rather than interpreting it.
“The
power to postpone elections does not exist in any part of the Thai
Constitution at all,” Mr. Pornson said on Thai television. “The court
itself is trying to establish this power.”
No comments:
Post a Comment