Relocating Traditions in China
Village-based traditions once practiced by close-living families and neighbors are disappearing in an increasingly urban China.
|
In China, ‘Once the Villages Are Gone, the Culture Is Gone’
International New York Times | 1 Feb. 2014
BEIJING
— Once or twice a week, a dozen amateur musicians meet under a highway
overpass on the outskirts of Beijing, carting with them drums, cymbals
and the collective memory of their destroyed village. They set up
quickly, then play music that is almost never heard anymore, not even
here, where the steady drone of cars muffles the lyrics of love and
betrayal, heroic deeds and kingdoms lost.
The
musicians used to live in Lei Family Bridge, a village of about 300
households near the overpass. In 2009, the village was torn down to
build a golf course and residents were scattered among several housing
projects, some a dozen miles away.
“I
want to keep this going,” said Lei Peng, 27, who inherited leadership
of the group from his grandfather. “When we play our music, I think of
my grandfather. When we play, he lives.”
Across
China, cultural traditions like the Lei family’s music are under
threat. Rapid urbanization means village life, the bedrock of Chinese
culture, is rapidly disappearing, and with it, traditions and history.
“Chinese
culture has traditionally been rural-based,” says Feng Jicai, a
well-known author and scholar. “Once the villages are gone, the culture
is gone.”
That
is happening at a stunning rate. In 2000, China had 3.7 million
villages, according to research by Tianjin University. By 2010, that
figure had dropped to 2.6 million, a loss of about 300 villages a day.
For
decades, leaving the land was voluntary, as people moved to the cities
for jobs. In the past few years, the shift has accelerated as
governments have pushed urbanization, often leaving villagers with no
choice but to move.
China’s
top leadership has equated urbanization with modernization and economic
growth. Local governments are also promoting it, seeing the sale of
rural land rights as a way to compensate for a weak tax base. Evicting
residents and selling long-term leases to developers has become a
favored method for local governments to balance budgets and local
officials to line their pockets. Numerous local officials are under
investigation for corruption linked to rural land sales.
Destroying
villages and their culture also reveals deeper biases. A common insult
in China is to call someone a farmer, a word equated with backwardness
and ignorance, while the most valued cultural traditions are elite
practices like landscape painting, calligraphy and court music.
But
in recent years, Chinese scholars have begun to recognize the
countryside’s vast cultural heritage. A mammoth government project has
cataloged roughly 9,700 examples nationwide of “intangible cultural
heritage,” fragile traditions like songs, dances, rituals, martial arts,
cuisines and theater. About 80 percent of them are rural.
In
the past few years, for example, Mr. Feng has documented the
destruction of 36 villages in Nanxian, a county on Tianjin’s outskirts,
home to a famous center of woodblock printing.
“You
don’t know if it will survive or not because when they’re in their new
homes they’re scattered,” he said. “The knowledge isn’t concentrated
anymore and isn’t transmitted to a new generation.”
That
is the problem facing the musicians in Lei Family Bridge. The village
lies on what used to be a great pilgrimage route from Beijing north to
Mount Yaji and west to Mount Miaofeng, holy mountains that dominated
religious life in the capital. Each year, temples on those mountains
would have great feast days spread over two weeks. The faithful from
Beijing would walk to the mountains, stopping at Lei Family Bridge for
food, drink and entertainment.
Groups
like Mr. Lei’s, known as pilgrimage societies, performed free for the
pilgrims. Their music is based on stories about court and religious life
from roughly 800 years ago and features a call-and-response style, with
Mr. Lei singing key plotlines of the story and the other performers,
decked out in colorful costumes, chanting back. The music is found in
other villages, too, but each one has its own repertoire and local
variations that musicologists have only begun to examine.
When
the Communists took over in 1949, these pilgrimages were mostly banned,
but were revived starting in the 1980s when the leadership relaxed
control over society. The temples, mostly destroyed during the Cultural
Revolution, were rebuilt.
The
performers, however, are declining in numbers and increasingly old. The
universal allures of modern life — computers, movies, television — have
siphoned young people away from traditional pursuits. But the physical
fabric of the performers’ lives has also been destroyed.
One
recent afternoon, Mr. Lei walked through the village, now reduced to
rubble and overgrown with wild grass and bushes. He started singing with
his grandfather when he was 2. He now has an office job in the city’s
public transportation company and spends all his vacation time working
on the troupe.
“This
was our house,” he said, gesturing to a small rise of rubble and
overgrown weeds. “They all lived in the streets around here. We
performed at the temple.”
The
temple is one of the few buildings still standing. (The Communist Party
headquarters is another.) Built in the 18th century, the temple is made
of wooden beams and tiled roofs, surrounded by a seven-foot wall. Its
brightly painted colors have faded. The weather-beaten wood is cracking
in the dry, windy Beijing air. Part of the roof has caved in, and the
wall is crumbling.
“It
used to be on a list of historic preservation,” Mr. Lei said. “The
government says it will be rebuilt, but no one seems to know anything.”
Government urban-planning officials could not be reached for comment on the village.
Evenings
after work, the musicians would meet in the temple to practice. As
recently as Mr. Lei’s grandfather’s generation, the performers could
fill a day with songs without repeating themselves. Today, they can sing
only a handful. Some middle-aged people have joined the troupe, so on
paper they have a respectable 45 members. But meetings are so hard to
arrange that the newcomers never learn much, he said, and performing
under a highway overpass is unattractive.
“I
guess for a lot of us it’s a hobby,” said Li Lan, 55, a cymbalist and
singer. “It’s just so inconvenient now to come out here and practice.”
Over
the past two years, the Ford Foundation underwrote music and
performance classes for 23 children from migrant families from other
parts of China. Mr. Lei taught them to sing, and to apply the bright
makeup used during performances. Last May, they performed at the Mount
Miaofeng temple fair, earning stares of admiration from other pilgrimage
societies also facing aging and declining membership.
But the project’s funding ended over the summer, and the children drifted away.
“I
think it’s pointless because you have to be from our village to
understand how important this is,” Mr. Lei said. “Anyway, those children
will move somewhere else and won’t learn long enough to become real
members. It was nice but didn’t fix the problem.”
One
of the oddities of the troupe’s struggles is that some traditional
artisans now get government support. The government lists them on a
national register, organizes performances and offers modest subsidies to
some.
Last
month, Mr. Lei’s group was featured on local television and invited to
perform at Chinese New Year activities. Such performances raise about
$200 and provide some recognition that what the group does matters.
Du
Yang, director of the district office of intangible cultural heritage
protection, said the group’s music was among 69 protected practices in
her district.
“The
goal is to make sure these cultural heritages don’t get lost,” she
said. “It would be a great pity if they are lost just as our country is
on the road to prosperity.”
Mr. Lei said that keeping their village life intact would have helped most.
“It
was really comfortable in the old village,” he said back in his new
home, a small two-bedroom apartment high up in an apartment block a
half-hour drive away. “We had a thousand square meters and rented out
rooms to migrants from other provinces. Lots of buses stopped nearby,
and we could get into the city easily.”
Like
all rural residents, the Leis and their neighbors never owned their
land; all land in China belongs to the state. So when the plans were
announced to build the golf course, they had little choice but to move.
“No one protested,” he said. “We knew we didn’t have a choice. You have
to just go with the flow.”
Everyone got free apartments and $50,000 to $100,000 in compensation.
Strangely,
however, the golf course has never been built, and the village still
lies in ruins. No one here can figure out if this is because the
development was illegal, or perhaps part of a corrupt land deal that is
under investigation. Such information is not public, so villagers can
only speculate. Mostly, they try to forget.
“I try not to think about these things too much,” Mr. Lei said. “Instead, I try to focus on the music and keeping it alive.”
No comments:
Post a Comment