“The 23”, as they have become known, were initially kept
incommunicado for almost a week after being carted off to the notorious
CC3 prison, near the border with Vietnam.
They have since been charged with aggravated intentional violence and
aggravated intentional property damage. All 23 have been denied bail
and many are said to be in poor health, especially Independent Democracy
of Informal Economy Association (IDEA) head Vorn Pov.
On the outside looking in
Phnom Penh Post | 5 February 2014
Having travelled for three hours from Phnom Penh in the back of
a taxi with her month-old daughter yesterday morning, Van Monika stood
on the red dirt road outside the fences of Correctional Centre 3 prison
in Kampong Cham and cried.
She had been denied permission to visit her husband, 26-year-old
security guard Pa Sarat, who has not seen his newborn daughter since she
was four days old on January 3 – the day Monika says military police
broke down the door to their home, viciously beat Sarat and dragged him
away.
Monika, a garment worker at Canadia Industrial Park, near where the
clashes erupted, was still in hospital recovering from childbirth. She
has only seen him once since then. “My daughter cannot see her father
and her father cannot see her,” Monika said, cradling her baby, clad in
white pyjamas and a pink beanie despite the midday heat, in her arms.
“I don’t know when I will have time to visit again because it is very
difficult for me. My husband has not done anything wrong. Please
release him.”
Sarat is one of 23 rights activists, unionists, workers, protesters
and bystanders who were detained by authorities over two days early last
month amid protests by garment workers for a doubling of their monthly
minimum wage.
“The 23”, as they have become known, were initially kept
incommunicado for almost a week after being carted off to the notorious
CC3 prison, near the border with Vietnam.
They have since been charged with aggravated intentional violence and
aggravated intentional property damage. All 23 have been denied bail
and many are said to be in poor health, especially Independent Democracy
of Informal Economy Association (IDEA) head Vorn Pov.
With the Cambodia National Rescue Party publicly announcing that a
group of lawmakers and senators were planning on visiting the detainees
yesterday morning – despite a request for permission having been
rejected by the Phnom Penh court – the authorities blocked the road 100
metres from the prison’s gates, with strict orders not to allow anyone
in when Monika arrived at 7:30am.
Dozens of prison guards and soldiers, many armed with bamboo or
wooden clubs, which they received the evening before, according to one
soldier, were also deployed to the vicinity ahead of the politicians’
mid-morning arrival.
Knowing that the presence of the opposition party was likely to
jeopardise her visit, Nhuong Soheang also arrived much earlier in the
morning, hoping that she would be allowed to visit her fiancé, Coalition
of Cambodia Farmers Community president Theng Savoeun, before tensions
escalated. But the effort was to no avail, with guards telling her they
had received orders from their superiors not to allow anyone in.
“I am a relative of the victim. I have the right to see him, so it is
wrong what the prison guards have done to us. They told us before that
we could come to visit any time, even on a Sunday,” she said.
When the six CNRP senators and 12 elected parliamentarians arrived at
11am, party whip Son Chhay demanded to meet with the ranking prison
official to request that the politicians be allowed to enter to check
the conditions of the 23 detained.
“We just want to visit them, because we heard that they were
seriously beaten during the crackdown and have not received proper
medical treatment. We are doing what is our duty as parliamentarians and
senators to do,” he said.
A prison guard cheekily rebutted that the opposition lawmakers
couldn’t be considered parliamentarians until they had sworn in at the
National Assembly.
Eventually, Kear Sovana, the CC3 prison director, came out to explain
that, as expected, the CNRP would not be allowed to visit the detainees
because they had been rejected permission by the court.
As for the relatives, no visitors would be allowed to enter the
prison because the lawmakers’ visit had raised tensions in the facility
and problems could arise, he said. The detainees, Sovana added, were
receiving proper medical care, so the CNRP had nothing to worry about.
“We have allowed their relatives to come and visit them every day
since they were arrested, but today we cannot allow them to visit,
because the situation inside the prison is difficult to control. After
[the prisoners] heard that the CNRP was coming to visit today they
became excited,” he said. “The 23 detainees are not important [compared]
to the 1,500 prisoners in the prison. If they revolt, who is in charge?
That’s why I have to prohibit relatives coming to visit for one day.”
But Chhay was not buying such arguments.
“The intention is to meet them and ensure they are being looked
after. We do not want to interfere with them, we just want to see for
ourselves if they are okay,” he said, adding that he had personally
visited several prisons in the past without a problem.
Am Sam Ath, senior investigator at rights group Licadho, said it was clear that the 23 detainees had become politicised.
“In this case, [both the CNRP and CPP] have not separated political
issues and just visiting prisoners. If they continue to politicise this
issue, the victims will be the 23 people,” he said.
But whether or not their loved ones are pawns in a bigger game will
mean little to Soheang, Monika and all the other family members who
wished to visit the detainees yesterday.
“They said that next time we come they will let us in. But it is not
easy for us, because it is far and we have to spend a lot of money on
travelling,” Soheang said.
Sometime not letting visitors or relative to see the 23 union activity could it be they are torturing them in Prision, despite not having their case heard in court? They should be free, while those that committed the killing and causing of the voilents should be put in this prison. CPP got it the wrong way round, the criminals that the CPP hire are free but the innocent citizen whom only request a pay increased end up in a coffin and those injured end up in prison. So to all consumer of Cambodia made products do you still want to keep buying Cambodian made that is made in "blood" and "lost of life"...they should freeze buying goods from those company and they should freeze importing from Cambodia until those criminals, killer and murders are put in prision and the 23 union activities is free.
ReplyDelete