Strike debate a ‘red herring’
Workers undoubtedly have the fundamental right to strike, and
any arguments as to whether such rights exist are merely “red herring
debates”, the UN special rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful
assembly and of association Maina Kiai said yesterday.
Speaking outside the foreign ministry, Kiai told reporters that the
right to strike has for generations been globally recognised as a
fundamental tool of unions and workers, and “cannot, and must not” be
taken away from them.
“Under international law … there is a right to assembly and to
assemble peacefully for any purpose. Now … assembly can be a protest,
assembly can be in a room, assembly can be a strike, it can be a
sit-down,” he said.
“So there is absolutely a right to strike, let me make it clear … and
I’m sure it’s protected by the ILO conventions. There is no need; it
doesn’t make any sense to have a union if it can’t strike. Then what
will the unions do apart from picking money from the workers?”
His comments come after the Cambodian Federation of Employers and
Business Associations (CAMFEBA) and the Garment Manufacturers
Association in Cambodia (GMAC) accused the International Labour
Organization of undermining employers’ credibility and “creating
tensions” by rejecting statements made by those associations that no
such “fundamental” right exists.
Seperately, Kiai said he had raised strong concerns with the
government about the “blanket ban” on public assembly imposed in the
aftermath of violent clashes between striking workers and authorities in
early January, an approach that he emphasised was not recommended.
“If there is any violence in a protest, the right approach is to find
the people that are violent, take them out of the protest and prosecute
them. But a protest or a gathering or an assembly or a demonstration is
not violent by the fact that some people are violent in there,” he
said.
A lifting of the temporary ban was being “considered” by the
government, Kiai said he had been told, though no specific date as to
when that might happen was given.
He added that he saw no reason why the government would not invite him to make an official visit to the Kingdom.
Government spokesman Phay Siphan said yesterday that the government
wished to solve numerous issues – such as that of garment workers’
minimum wage – through discussions, in order to ease tensions, before
the ban on assembly could be lifted.
“We wish to have a peaceful atmosphere to solve that issue. We
understand that those organised demonstrations, they always challenge
with the government. The purpose is not to solve the issue of minimum
wage,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment