President
Obama could also credential a different style of public sector leader.
If you are trying to pass legislation, you staff your administration
with political operatives. But if you are trying to change the
discussion and mobilize the country, you hire and promote social
entrepreneurs, people from Ashoka, Teach for America, Opportunity
International, the International Justice Mission and the Clinton Global
Initiative. Once hired in this White House, these people will be filling
senior government jobs for decades to come.
The Opportunity Coalition
International New York Times | 30 Jan. 2014
David Brooks
President
Obama can spend the remainder of his term planting a few more high-tech
hubs, working on reforming the patent law and doing the other modest
things he mentioned in his State of the Union address. And if he did
that, he might do some marginal good, and he would manage the stately
decline of his presidency during its final few years.
Or,
alternately, he can realize that he is now at a moment of liberation.
For the past five years he has been inhibited by the need to please
donors, to cater to various Congressional constituencies and to play by
Washington rules.
This
means he will have the opportunity to build what he himself could have
used over the past few years: An Opportunity Coalition. He’ll have the
chance to organize bipartisan groups of mayors, business leaders,
legislators, activists and donors into permanent alliances and
institutions that will formulate, lobby for, fund and promote
opportunity and social mobility agendas for decades to come.
There
are already signs that President Obama is stepping back to take the
long view. In his interviews with David Remnick of The New Yorker, he
observed that the president is “essentially a relay swimmer in a river
full of rapids.” You are trying to do your leg and pass things along to
the next swimmer. As president, he’s been made aware of how little a
president can accomplish unless there is organized support from the
outside. Obama now has the chance to build that support for future
presidents, on the issues that concern him most.
He
might start, for example, by scrambling the current political
categories. We now have one liberal tradition that believes in using
government to enhance equality. We have another conservative tradition
that believes in limiting government to enhance freedom. These two
traditions have fought to a standstill and prevented Obama from passing
much domestic legislation of late.
But
there is a third ancient tradition that weaves through American
history, geared directly at enhancing opportunity and social mobility.
This is the Whig tradition, which begins with people like Henry Clay,
Daniel Webster and Abraham Lincoln. This tradition believes in using the
power of government to give marginalized Americans the tools to compete
in a capitalist economy.
The
Whigs fought against the divisive populist Jacksonians. They argued
that it is better to help people move between classes than to pit
classes against each other. They also transcended our current political
divisions.
The
Whigs were interventionist in economics while they were traditionalist
and family-oriented in their moral and social attitudes. They believed
America should step boldly into the industrial age, even as they
championed cultural order. The Whigs championed large infrastructure
projects and significant public investments, even as they believed in
sacred property rights. They believed in expanding immigration along
with assimilation and cohesion.
President
Obama could travel the country modernizing the Whig impulse,
questioning current divisions and eroding the rigid battle lines. More
concretely, he could create a group of Simpson-Bowles-type commissions —
with legislators, mayors, governors and others brought together to
offer concrete proposals on mobility issues from the beginning to the
end of the life span:
Is
there a way to improve family patterns so disadvantaged young children
grow up in more ordered environments? Is there a way to improve Head
Start and intelligently expand early childhood education? Is there a way
to structure neighborhoods so that teenagers are more likely to thrive?
Is there a way to get young men wage subsidies so they are worth
marrying? Is there a way to train or provide jobs for unemployed
middle-aged workers?
These
commissions could issue their reports in the spring of 2016, to make
life maximally difficult for the next presidential candidates.
President
Obama could also credential a different style of public sector leader.
If you are trying to pass legislation, you staff your administration
with political operatives. But if you are trying to change the
discussion and mobilize the country, you hire and promote social
entrepreneurs, people from Ashoka, Teach for America, Opportunity
International, the International Justice Mission and the Clinton Global
Initiative. Once hired in this White House, these people will be filling
senior government jobs for decades to come.
President
Obama began his career as an organizer. His mobility agenda floundered
because the governing majority he needed to push it forward does not
exist. He has the chance to remedy that, to organize, to convene, to
build, and to make life a lot easier for the next swimmer in the race.
No comments:
Post a Comment