Confusion Over Radar Recasts Theories in Jet Disappearance
SEPANG,
Malaysia — The Malaysian authorities denied on Thursday a widely
circulated report that the missing Malaysia Airlines jetliner had
transmitted technical data after contact with the cockpit was lost.
The
head of Malaysia Airlines said the last technical data received from
Flight 370, less than half an hour after takeoff, indicated no trouble
with the plane.
“That
was the last transmission,” Ahmad Jauhari Yahya, the chief executive of
Malaysia Airlines, said at a news conference. “It did not run beyond
that.”
The
Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday that Rolls-Royce, the maker of
the aircraft’s engines, had received data transmissions from those
engines under a routine maintenance schedule, suggesting that the plane
was aloft for several hours after contact was lost.
If
confirmed, the report could mean that the plane flew more than 2,000
miles beyond the point at which it was last tracked by the civil
aviation authorities.
Hishammuddin Hussein, Malaysia’s defense minister, said on Thursday at a news conference that the report was inaccurate.
While
the company had been cooperating with the Malaysian authorities since
the plane disappeared, Rolls-Royce said, international aviation rules
left it to investigators to determine what information was released
about their findings.
An
aviation official, speaking in return for anonymity as the
investigation is continuing, said the engines do not usually transmit a
continuous stream of data to the manufacturers. The data is usually
transmitted on takeoff and landing, and possibly when an airplane
settles at its cruising speed and altitude, the official said.
The
Malaysian authorities also said debris that Chinese satellites were
said to have spotted floating in the South China Sea were not found by
vessels dispatched to the area.
Mr.
Hishammuddin, who is also the country’s acting transport minister, said
officials had contacted counterparts in the Chinese government who told
them, “The images were released by mistake and did not show any
debris.”
On
Wednesday, after four days of reticence and evasive answers, the
Malaysian military acknowledged that it had recorded, but initially
ignored, radar signals that could have prompted a mission to intercept
and track the missing jetliner. The radar data vastly expanded the area
where the plane might have traveled.
Radar
signals from the location where the missing aircraft was last contacted
by ground controllers suggested that the plane may have turned away
from its northeastward course toward Beijing, officials said. Military
radar then detected an unidentified aircraft at several points,
apparently headed west across the Malaysian peninsula and out into the
Indian Ocean, the head of the country’s air force told reporters. The
last detected location was hundreds of miles to the west of where search
and rescue efforts were initially focused.
The
military took no immediate action on Saturday to investigate the
unidentified blips, whose path appeared to take the aircraft near the
heavily populated island of Penang, and only later realized the
significance of the radar readings. The search area was then expanded to
take in waters west of the peninsula as well as east — encompassing
almost 27,000 square nautical miles, an area bigger than South Carolina —
but officials did not give a full explanation for the move.
Gen.
Rodzali Daud, the Malaysian air force chief, said Wednesday that the
military was not certain that its radar had detected the jetliner
heading west across the peninsula. He declined to offer another
explanation for the coincidence of an unidentified blip suddenly
appearing on military radar screens after Flight 370 stopped
transmitting its identification signal to civilian ground controllers 40
minutes into its flight.
“Today
we are still not sure that it is the same aircraft,” Mr. Hishammuddin,
the defense minister, told reporters on Wednesday. “That is why we are
searching in two areas.”
Malaysia
is sharing the radar data with officials from American agencies,
including the Federal Aviation Administration and the National
Transportation Safety Board.
No comments:
Post a Comment