The Employer’s Creed
International New York Times | 31 March 2014
Dear Employers,
You
may not realize it, but you have a powerful impact on the culture and
the moral ecology of our era. If your human resources bosses decide they
want to hire a certain sort of person, then young people begin turning
themselves into that sort of person.
Therefore,
I’m asking you to think about the following principles, this Employer’s
Creed. If you follow these principles in your hiring practices, you’ll
be sending a signal about what sort of person gets ahead. You may
correct some of the perversities at the upper reaches of our
meritocracy. You may even help cultivate deeper, fuller human beings.
Bias hiring decisions against perfectionists.
If you work in a white-collar sector that attracts highly educated job
applicants, you’ve probably been flooded with résumés from people who
are not so much human beings as perfect avatars of success. They got 3.8
grade-point averages in high school and college. They served in the
cliché leadership positions on campus. They got all the perfect
consultant/investment bank internships. During off-hours they
distributed bed nets in Zambia and dug wells in Peru.
When
you read these résumés, you have two thoughts. First, this applicant is
awesome. Second, there’s something completely flavorless here. This
person has followed the cookie-cutter formula for what it means to be
successful and you actually have no clue what the person is really like
except for a high talent for social conformity. Either they have no
desire to chart out an original life course or lack the courage to do
so. Shy away from such people.
Bias hiring decisions toward dualists.
The people you want to hire should have achieved some measure of
conventional success, but they should have also engaged in some
desperate lark that made no sense from a career or social status
perspective. Maybe a person left a successful banking job to rescue the
family dry-cleaning business in Akron. Maybe another had great grades at
a fancy East Coast prep school but went off to a Christian college
because she wanted a place to explore her values. These peoples have
done at least one Deeply Unfashionable Thing. Such people have intrinsic
motivation, native curiosity and social courage.
Bias toward truth-tellers.
I recently ran into a fellow who hires a lot of people. He said he asks
the following question during each interview. “Could you describe a
time when you told the truth and it hurt you?” If the interviewee can’t
immediately come up with an episode, there may be a problem here.
Reward the ripening virtues, not the blooming virtues.
Some virtues bloom forth with youth: being intelligent, energetic,
curious and pleasant. Some virtues only ripen over time:
other-centeredness, having a sense for how events will flow, being able
to discern what’s right in the absence of external affirmation. These
virtues usually come with experience, after a person has taken time off
to raise children, been fired or learned to cope with having a cruel
boss. The blooming virtues are great if you are hiring thousands of
consultants to churn out reports. For most other jobs, you want the
ripening ones, too.
Reward those who have come by way of sorrow.
Job seekers are told to present one linear narrative to the world, one
that can easily be read and digested as a series of clean conquests. But
if you are stuck in an airport bar with a colleague after a horrible
business trip, would you really want to have a drink with a person like
that? No, you’d want a real human being, someone who’d experienced
setback, suffering and recovery. You’d want someone with obvious holes
in his résumé, who has learned the lessons that only suffering teaches,
and who got back on track.
Reward cover letter rebels.
Job seeking is the second greatest arena of social pretense in modern
life — after dating. But some people choose not to spin and exaggerate.
They choose not to make each occasion seem more impressive than it
really was. You want people who are radically straight, even with
superiors.
You
could argue that you don’t actually want rich, full personalities for
your company. You just want achievement drones who can perform specific
tasks. I doubt that’s in your company’s long-term interests. But if you
fear leaping out in this way, at least think of the effect you’re having
on the deeper sensibilities of the next generation, the kind of souls
you are incentivizing and thus fashioning, the legacy you will leave
behind.
No comments:
Post a Comment