Anti-China Riots in Vietnam Leave at Least 21 Dead
TIME | 15 May 2014
Protests against China's territorial ambitions in the South China Sea have spread to central Vietnam, where more factories have been torched. Hundreds of ethnic Chinese have fled the country
At least 21 people were killed as anti-China riots in southern Vietnam escalated and spread to the center of the country on Thursday.
A doctor in Ha Tinh province described five of the dead as Vietnamese
workers and others as Chinese. He said they were among roughly 100
people sent to his hospital, Reuters reports. Over 600 Chinese have fled
across the border to Cambodia.
Rioters have torched and vandalized dozens of foreign-owned
factories, mistaking them for Chinese enterprises. On Wednesday, they
attacked a $20 billion Taiwanese-owned steel plant set to be the largest
in Southeast Asia once it is completed in 2020.
About 600 people have been arrested for looting and inciting the
crowd in Binh Duong province, where the riots started, state-run Thanh Nien newspaper quoted the local police chief as saying.
An editorial in the Beijing-friendly Global Times
said that Vietnam had “cornered itself” and pointed out that
demonstrators during similar outbursts of nationalist fervor in China —
such as the anti-Japan demonstrations of 2012 — were more restrained.
(However, Japanese automakers lost an estimated $250 million in output during the protests over the disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu islands.)
Vietnamese and Philippine hopes of a united regional stance in the face of Chinese assertiveness were meanwhile dashed
as Southeast Asian leaders failed to agree on a joint statement during
the ASEAN summit last weekend. Hanoi and Manila are the most embroiled
in territorial conflicts with China in the South China Sea, but face
opposition from neighboring countries with precious economic ties to
Beijing.
The United States has called on both sides to show restraint, with
White House spokesman Jay Carney telling a regular briefing that this
kind of dispute needs “to be resolved through dialogue, not through
intimidation.”
No comments:
Post a Comment