CPP passes judicial laws in Senate
Three controversial draft laws that sailed through the National
Assembly last month were rubber-stamped by the Senate yesterday,
according to a Senate statement, amid an opposition boycott of the
session and despite near-universal condemnation.
Forty-four senators from the ruling Cambodian People’s Party voted to adopt the three bills.
The Law on the Organisation and Functioning of the Courts, the Law on
the Amendment of the Supreme Council of Magistracy and the Law on the
Status of Judges and Prosecutors will officially go into effect when
signed by King Norodom Sihamoni.
As was the case in the National Assembly, where the Cambodia National
Rescue Party is still refusing to take its seats, the laws were passed
without the participation of the 11 opposition senators, who boycotted
the session.
“The lack of public consultation on the draft laws sees Cambodia
moving toward a military junta with its power derived from a
Constitutional coup, and it is no different from the [Khmer Rouge
regime] between 1975 and 1979,” the opposition senators wrote in
statement on Wednesday.
Civil society groups have universally decried the laws, which will
give the Ministry of Justice control over the administration of courts,
the Supreme Council of Magistracy and the promotions and disciplining of
judges and prosecutors, effectively erasing the division between the
judicial and executive branches of government, they argue.
Constitutionally speaking, the laws won’t be enacted without the
King’s signature. Om Daravuth, an adviser to the office of the Queen
Mother, said yesterday that he had not seen the draft laws, and was
unsure of how the King would approach them, but said he would give the
laws his full attention.
“I could not say anything at the moment about whether the King will
sign the draft laws or not, because the draft laws are not yet in my
hands,” Daravuth said. “I know that the draft laws were criticised by
civil society groups, so when the drafts are in my hand I will examine
them before reporting to the King.”
Senior CPP lawmaker Cheam Yeap, however, was confident yesterday that the laws would come into effect without challenge.
“As for the [laws that] pass, the King has never refused to sign them,” he said.
Political analyst Lao Mong Hay also said it was unlikely that the
King would stall the laws, and noted that even Sihamoni’s father, King
Father Norodom Sihanouk, would register his protest with flawed
legislation by simply leaving the signing to someone else.
“Our King Father, when he was unhappy with such-and-such a law, he …
would go to get medical treatment in China, and would let the acting
head of state [constitutionally, the president of the Senate] sign on
his behalf,” Mong Hay said. “The King’s son has less latitude – or none
at all, actually – to be like his father. It is very unlikely he would
refuse to sign and promulgate those three laws.”
Given the laws’ fundamental nature, they should be subject to review
by the Constitutional Council, though even that body would be unlikely
to block them, Mong Hay added, noting that the council has made “no
objection I can remember”.
No comments:
Post a Comment