Religious Freedom in Peril
International New York Times | 10 July 2014
A
Sudanese court in May sentences a Christian woman married to an
American to be hanged, after first being lashed 100 times, after she
refuses to renounce her Christian faith.
Muslim extremists in Iraq demand that Christians pay a tax or face crucifixion, according to the Iraqi government.
In Malaysia, courts ban some non-Muslims from using the word “Allah.”
In
country after country, Islamic fundamentalists are measuring their own
religious devotion by the degree to which they suppress or assault those
they see as heretics, creating a human rights catastrophe as people are
punished or murdered for their religious beliefs.
This
is a sensitive area I’m wading into here, I realize. Islam-haters in
America and the West seize upon incidents like these to denounce Islam
as a malignant religion of violence, while politically correct liberals
are reluctant to say anything for fear of feeding bigotry. Yet there is a
real issue here of religious tolerance, affecting millions of people,
and we should be able to discuss it.
No
doubt the killers thought themselves pious Muslims. Yet such extremists
do far more damage to the global reputation of Islam than all the
world’s Islamophobes put together.
The paradox is that Islam historically was relatively tolerant. In 628, Muhammad issued a document of protection to the monks of St. Catherine’s Monastery.
“No compulsion
is to be on them,” he wrote. “If a female Christian is married to a
Muslim, it is not to take place without her approval. She is not to be
prevented from visiting her church to pray.”
Anti-Semitism
runs deep in some Muslim countries today, but, for most of history,
Muslims were more tolerant of Jews than Christians were. As recently as
the Dreyfus Affair in France more than a century ago, Muslims defended a
Jew from the anti-Semitism of Christians.
Likewise,
the most extreme modern case of religious persecution involved
Europeans trying to exterminate Jews in the Holocaust. Since then, one
of the worst religious massacres was the killing of Muslims by
Christians at Srebrenica in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
It’s also true that some of the bravest champions of religious freedom today are Muslim. Mohammad Ali Dadkhah,
an Iranian lawyer, represented a Christian pastor pro bono,
successfully defending him from charges of apostasy. But Dadkhah was
then arrested himself and is now serving a nine-year prison sentence.
A Pew Research Center study found Muslims victims of religious repression
in about as many countries as Christians. But some of the worst abuse
actually takes place in Muslim-dominated countries. In Pakistan, for
example, a brutal campaign has been underway
against the Shiite minority. Likewise, Iran represses the peaceful
Bahai, and similarly Pakistan and other countries brutally mistreat the
Ahmadis, who see themselves as Muslims but are regarded as apostates.
Pakistani Ahmadis can be arrested simply for saying, “peace be upon
you.”
All
this is a sad index of rising intolerance, for Pakistan’s first foreign
minister was an Ahmadi; now that would be impossible.
I
hesitated to write this column because religious repression is an
awkward topic when it thrives in Muslim countries. Muslims from Gaza to
Syria, Western Sahara to Myanmar, are already enduring plenty without
also being scolded for intolerance. It’s also true that we in the West
live in glass houses, and I don’t want to empower our own chauvinists or
fuel Islamophobia.
Yet
religious freedom is one of the most basic of human rights, and one in
peril in much of the world. Some heroic Muslims, like my friend Rashid
in Pakistan, have sacrificed their lives to protect religious freedom.
Let’s follow their lead and speak up as well, for silence would be a
perversion of politeness.
No comments:
Post a Comment