Pseng-Pseng
Hang Choun Naron's Policy Pitfall
“It is true that quality
education is quality teacher, but if the students do not work, good teachers
will not solve the problem”.
Education minister Hang Choun Naron, 30 August 2014, Interview
with Radio Free Asia
“There will be no
exceptions at the second exam. At that time, you will at least be held in pre-trial
detention for one month—that would be long enough to remove your name from the
payroll… You are the teachers and if you mistreat or cheat your own students it
would not be different from a father raping his daughter.”
ACU president Om Yentieng, 28 August 2014, The Cambodia Daily
It seems like a chicken and egg
situation – which one comes first, students, or teachers? The education
minister is decisive: it must be students. He says the students are more
important due to the fact that better teachers prefer Phnom Penh, yet the Phnom
Penh’s pass rate is lower than those of two isolated provinces in the recent
Bac II exams. His logic is flawed – he ignores the overwhelming evidence that the
Phnom Penh rate is much higher than the national average. Hence, his policy that
focuses on students by making them studious, moving curriculum emphasis from
arts to science, and strengthening teacher training, may be ineffective.
First, the ministry has implemented the teacher
training program countless times in the past few decades, and the outcome is
that students must rely on outright cheating to achieve the over 80% pass rate.
Thus, the minister’s policy of strengthening it will more likely exacerbate a resources
misuse.
Second, the change of
emphasis from arts to science is sound. The minister is right Cambodia needs
more engineers and technicians, making math and science subjects imperative.
But the challenge is how to move from arts that many think is easy – though
Mozart’s IQ exceeds 160 – to science that requires a well-functioning left
brain hemisphere. Of course, students with an Einstein IQ could work their way
to anything. But the majority will require teachers who are well-qualified and
well-resourced; otherwise, both the teachers and students will be stumbling in
the dark to nowhere.
Third, the minister’s policy
of making students work, or work harder, is appropriate. He may be right tightening
exam processes will induce students to work hard, but the unscheduled resit he
must organize to appease his premier is likely to lessen the policy effectiveness.
If a higher pass rate is necessary to maintain profits of the premier’s personal
interest groups that run universities, any manipulations – including resit and
lower test standard – will encourage the students to continue behaving as if
study is an option.
The best way to inspire
students to work hard is to improve a variable that constantly comes face to
face with them: the teachers. Only teachers can make complex subjects, like
math and science, fun to learn and easy to absorb.
Nevertheless, to carry
out their role effectively, teachers need decent remunerations for a respectful
life. They would stay focused on teaching effectiveness and on students’
progress, not on their stomach. There would be no need for them to keep their classroom
enterprises, or moonlighting elsewhere to survive.
A scrutiny of pass rates
for expensive private schools in Phnom Penh confirms teachers come first.
Theirs are much higher than the Phnom Penh average; and a better logic is that
rich parents are not stupid enough to pay top dollars for mediocre teachers.
Anyhow, it appears the dilapidated
education will continue for more decades, yet. The recent ACU’s threat of jail
time for teachers is outrageous, but it is consistent with the mentality that
keeps teachers in the dump.
Ung Bun Ang
10ix14
Should
you wish to be one of the first to receive Pseng-Pseng on your screen as soon
as it is released, subscribe to it at https://tinyletter.com/pseng-pseng
Pseng-Pseng
is published on the first, tenth, and twentieth day of every month. Previous
issues are archived at pseng-pseng.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment