Interview
ENOUGH Project / Flickr. Rep. Frank Wolf with citizen journalist Ryan
Boyette, interviewing a Nuban woman refugee in the Yida camp, Unity
State, South Sudan.
Our Battle Against Religious Persecution Is Floundering
Rep. Frank Wolf, human rights champion, calls on evangelicals to intensify the fight for religious liberty.
After 34 years in Congress, Frank Wolf, the renowned gadfly for human
rights and religious liberty, retires in January. But this 75-year-old
won’t be browsing Golfsmith for clubs. He’s more likely to fly back to
East Africa, where witnessing severe famine in Ethiopia changed the
course of his life in the early 1980s.
As co-chair of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission,
Wolf has traveled the world’s hot spots; adopted Gao Zhisheng, the
dissident lawyer from China; criticized the State Department’s
inattention to human rights; and fought to end to the genocide in
Darfur, Sudan.
Admired by conservatives, Wolf’s voting record in Congress gained a 100
percent rating by the National Right to Life. But he received a 0
percent from the American Civil Liberties Union. He voted to defund
Planned Parenthood, and voted against gay marriage and legalized
gambling.
The Virginia Republican, who represents wealthy Loudoun and Fairfax
counties, believes there are competent insiders in Congress to take the
religious liberty baton forward. But he agrees with many experts that
religious freedom is declining worldwide.
Wolf calls on evangelical leaders to step up their game for human
rights among all at-risk faith groups—Christian, Jewish, Islamic
minorities, Bahá’í, and others. He spoke recently to Timothy C. Morgan,
CT senior editor, global journalism.
People who focus on the decline in religious freedom have told me repeatedly that our State Department is part of the problem.
I agree, even during the Bush and Reagan years. When Reagan put the words evil empire and tear down the wall in his speeches, the State Department took it out. Reagan put it back in.
Perhaps the problem is greater now. Our new ambassador to China, Max
Baucus, is a nice fellow from Montana. He does not speak out on human
rights in China. It’s all business, business, business, trade, trade,
trade. The Chinese know that’s what we’re interested in, so they don’t
move on the other side.
We need to hear from the pews, from outside of Washington, DC. When we
passed the Religious Freedom Commission, many churches had a Religious
Freedom Sunday in November. Few churches have them now. Churches are
changing their emphasis and approach.
Who inherits your bullhorn for religious freedom after you leave Congress?
Many good people will: Congressmen Randy Hultgren of Illinois, Mark
Meadows from North Carolina, Chris Smith of New Jersey, Trent Franks of
Arizona.
Many can pick up the baton.
I’m not leaving the issue of religious freedom. I could have stayed
here for many years. But I felt I could do more outside of Congress than
in Congress. I don’t play golf. My aim is to mobilize on the outside to
have an impact. I can take what I’ve learned, what works, what doesn’t
work, how to take it outside, and hopefully have an impact to advocate
for the voiceless.
Who most influenced your life to become a champion for human rights?
I was elected in 1980, but did nothing on this issue for 4 years.
Congressman Tony Hall called me after he returned from Ethiopia during
the famine in the early 1980s, so I naively flew to Ethiopia. What I saw
in the camp, kids dying, was life-changing. In 1985, Tony asked me to
go to Romania during Ceauşescu’s dictatorship. It was dark.Those two
trips led to where I am now.
Because you were on the ground, you smelled it, and you saw how people lived?
You just said the words: You smell it. You just go and see it and feel
it. You taste it. To travel to see, to feel, to touch, and to smell
makes the difference. Sometimes it hits you on the way back or when you
get back. Other times it hits you when you are there. The smell is the
key. In the United States I live in a nice community. I don’t worry for
my family’s safety, food and comfort. You can see the difference.
Going to Africa to see what’s going on opened my eyes. It was all new.
Outside one refugee camp I visited, women were being whipped to keep
them from getting inside the camp.
I encourage Americans to go to places like that. You see it. You touch it. It’s different than reading a book.
Overall, are you hopeful or pessimistic about the future for religious freedom?
The honest answer is pessimistic. What we need is a revival, for the
faith community to practice the teachings of Jesus, to bring them into
the marketplace in a winsome, loving way—not with voting cards and
voting records.
In my own Presbyterian denomination, I spoke out on the House floor
against the PCUSA vote to disinvest in Israel. I also asked
Presbyterians to sign a petition with roughly 260 religious leaders of
every denomination for the special envoy to advocate for Middle East
religious minorities: Christians, Amadis, Bahá’ís and others.
Presbyterian leaders refused because they thought it would offend the
Muslims.
The pessimistic camp is not a good one for me to be in.
What hope is there?
The book A God-Sized Vision
by Collin Hansen and John Woodbridge includes a chapter on the 1857
revival. It was led by Jeremiah Lanphier, an average person like me—a
business person, not a great evangelist.
Lanphier’s group met off Wall Street for one hour on Wednesdays during
lunch. The ground rules were you come in at 12 noon, but it’s okay if
you’re late or leave early. You sing a hymn. You have a prayer. No
prayer can go longer than five minutes. No controversial prayers. Close
with a hymn and a prayer. The revival spread nationwide.
If revival happens, I will be optimistic. If not, I will stay in the pessimistic corner.
What would you say to a young, promising Christian leader who asks,
“Should I come to Washington? Is this where things get done?”
I had dreamed of being in Congress since third grade. People would tell
me I couldn’t because I stuttered. I’ve been able to do some things,
but currently not much is being done in Washington. The Congress is
polarized. Not everyone has to come here to change things. I would not
discourage people from coming. If you come, make sure you are grounded
or this place will capture you.
Why do you say the arts should take up the cause for religious liberty in a more robust way?
The Chariots of Fire beach running scene just gets me. Go see the movie Braveheart. The poet Allen Ginsberg said, “Whoever controls the media, the images, controls the culture.” He was right.
Right now, we’re making a video about Pakistani Christian human rights
leader Shahbaz Bhatti, a good friend of mine, who was assassinated in
March 2011. The film includes Washington’s Cardinal Wuerl and Baghdad,
Iraq’s Canon Andrew White.
Canon White recently told students at a Christian college chapel
service, “Don’t take care. Take risks.” Does that resonate with you?
I hope so, although I don’t want to put myself in the same category as Canon White. He lives in a tough neighborhood.
I’ve traveled to Chechnya, Sudan, Iraq, and Afghanistan. When the
Afghan war broke out, Congressmen Tony Hall and Joe Pitts and I wanted
to go. When we could not get into the country, we went to Pakistan,
jumped on a World Food Program flight, and went into countryside to see
what more could be done.
Is there an ideal foundation for this kind of advocacy?
Luke 4:18-19, Ecclesiastes 4:1, and many other Bible verses. People worldwide know America’s charter, the Declaration of Independence:
“All men are created equal, endowed by their Creator, with certain
unalienable rights . . . Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”
They may not know everything else in it, but, boy, that resonates. For
the West, America has provided leadership as the city on a hill. The
light is dim now. It had been bright.
Should the United States hold out a carrot to nations, while saying,
“Look, if you stress human rights, it will benefit your nation”?
The carrots are aid and trade. Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceauşescu fell
because of how he treated his people. The Chinese government will
probably fall in 10 to 15 years because of actions such as arresting
members and pastors of the government-sponsored Three Self Church. Good
people in governments worldwide look to us as the model.
Tony Hall went to a Muslim country. The ambassador said, “Mr. Hall,
this is a Muslim country. You’ve got to be careful.” A top leader in
that country asked, “Why are you here?”
Tony said, “We come in the spirit of Jesus of Nazareth . . .” This
Muslim leader then asked the American ambassador, “Why don’t you ever
talk to me about Jesus? My mother used to tell me about Jesus.” But that
ambassador had been telling Tony to not mention anything controversial.
We have much to offer if we come in the spirit of Jesus of Nazareth.
What are the big threats to religious freedom?
People of faith are under attack in different ways. In China, 24
Catholic bishops and hundreds of Protestant pastors are under house
arrest. In Tibet protests, at least 118 Buddhist monks and nuns have set
themselves on fire. Evangelicals, Catholics, and Buddhists are
persecuted in Vietnam. Christians in Damascus, Syria, have told us
horrendous stories.
In Iraq, the Christian community has dwindled from 1.5 million to
250,000 to 300,000. Iraq was the setting of more biblical activity than
any country other than Israel. Abraham is from Iraq. Ezekiel, Daniel,
and Jonah are buried there.
Political leadership in both American parties and the church in the
West have failed to advocate and speak out. Both the church in West and
the political leadership of America have lost their voices.
President Reagan spoke out strongly, saying the Declaration of
Independence and the Constitution were covenants, not just with the
people in Philadelphia, but with the entire world. China’s students in
Tiananmen knew that.
But advocacy is diminishing. The church hasn’t weighed in on these
issues. The political leadership won’t move on it without hearing from
the faith base.
Iranian pastor Saeed Abedini has been imprisoned in Iran since 2013. What can be done to gain his release?
In the Middle East, there’s a saying: First the Saturday people, then
the Sunday people. The Jewish community are the Saturday people;
Christians are the Sunday people. We don’t have much leverage over Iran.
The administration hasn’t done everything it can for Abedini, whose
wife appeared before my subcommittee, Tom Lantos Human Rights
Commission. Though we asked the administration to meet with her,
Secretary Kerry would not.
President Ford didn’t meet with Solzhenitsyn, but President Reagan did.
Bush met with the Dalai Lama. Projecting American influence abroad is
diminished now in reality as well as perception. We don’t have the
leverage.
Soviet-era dissident Natan Sharansky told me, “When people advocated
for me in the West, my life got better.” Chinese dissidents told me the
same; they even received better food. Much of that was in the 1980s. But
now our influence must be regained. May all the faiths speak out and
adopt these people.
Churches can adopt the imprisoned, write the Chinese embassy and
government, the American embassy in Beijing and the White House. If
you’re in China, visit their family.
The Bible calls for turning the other cheek and being the Good
Samaritan. But terrorists are beheading relief workers and journalists.
It’s dangerous out there.
Ecclesiastes 4:1 says, “Again I looked and saw all the oppression that
was taking place under the sun: I saw the tears of the oppressed—and
they have no comforter; power was on the side of their oppressors—and
they have no comforter.”
Jesus calls us to advocate for prisoners. Religious freedom is so
fundamental. As we follow Jesus, we should also advocate for persecuted
Bahá’í in Iran and for persecuted Buddhists in Tibet. This emphasis on
public justice cuts across religious fault lines.
In Luke 4:18–19, Jesus reads from Isaiah at the Nazareth synagogue:
“The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to proclaim
good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the
prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to set the oppressed
free, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.” The oppressed are
Buddhists monks in Tibet’s Drapchi prison, and the Amadi in jail. Power
is on the side of the oppressors. The gospel calls us to be comforters.
Let’s bring faith into the marketplace. All pastors and all churches and all denominations will want to embrace this.
What’s the right response when nations imprison human right activists like China’s Gao Zhisheng?
The right response is what the Jewish community did in the 1980s for
the Soviet refuseniks. Christians should pray, adopt prisoners of
conscience and flood the Chinese government, American embassy, and the
White House with letters. All the dissidents say the more publicity they
receive, the better their life gets, the greater their opportunity. I
adopted Gao, but he’s out now. In some respects, we in the West hold the
key to the cell. Will we put the key in and turn it?
I would love to see human rights and religious freedom among the top
issues in the presidential race or for Congress. The presidential
debates never included a question on this issue. Those running Congress
must articulate positions on what they will do for the persecuted
church.
If religious liberty could be among the five issues that candidates
must articulate their concern, it would make a big difference.
No comments:
Post a Comment