Watchdogs bite back
A coalition of monitors, whose findings bolstered the
opposition’s claims of election fraud following the 2013 poll, have
accused the CNRP of acquiescing to the ruling party at reform talks and
crafting an election law arguably worse than the one it is intended to
replace.
The Electoral Reform Alliance (ERA), which the government once accused of conspiring with the opposition to mislead the public about election irregularities, yesterday said the CNRP had folded on certain key principles of free and fair elections.
Their chief complaints include a vague provision that would fine NGOs
thousands of dollars if they are deemed to have “insulted” the parties
during the election campaign, and a failure to prevent soldiers and
court officials from campaigning while outside working hours and out of
uniform.
The final wording on both issues was agreed to by CNRP leader Sam
Rainsy during a meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Sar Kheng on Saturday
that focused on points that the parties’ lower-level working groups
could not agree on.
“With the current election law agreement, there are some setbacks.
[Things will] not really get better in the future election
administration,” Koul Panha, executive director of Comfrel, said
following a discussion organised by the ERA yesterday.
He added that the environment for election campaigns would actually
“get worse” with the restriction placed on NGO voices, the continued
campaigning of soldiers and the fact that a shortened 21-day campaign
period will allow for only four days of street rallies.
Kem Ley, who leads the Khmer for Khmer political network, called on
political leaders who were “afraid” of being insulted by civil society
groups to resign from their positions.
“Presidents of the parties have also insulted each other and insulted
development partners and civil society, so why don’t we use this law to
put pressure on them also?” he said.
“This new law is worse than the previous law. It restricts NGOs more
than before. The [Cambodian People’s Party] knows that no matter how bad
it acts [with election reform], it sees that the [CNRP] does not dare
to say it is bad, because they want to hide the reality of the reforms
after joining parliament.”
The CNRP ended its 10-month boycott of the National Assembly in
August last year after the CPP agreed to an overhaul of the electoral
system.
In November, opposition leader Sam Rainsy and Prime Minister Hun Sen
agreed that the internal rules of parliament would be amended to
recognise Rainsy as a US-style minority leader under a new “culture of
dialogue”.
Since then, the CNRP has been accused of being too soft on the
government. Both parties have also been criticised for failing to
consult with civil society during the now-completed drafting of a new
National Election Committee law or during negotiations on changes to the
election law.
Yang Kim Eng, president of the People Center for Development and
Peace, said at yesterday’s event that despite the promises of
significant reforms last year, “these reforms are increasingly making us
more worried than before”.
But Rainsy yesterday defended the agreements, saying they would
undoubtedly improve future elections to the point that his party would
win.
“I would like to tell all of you the good news, that the next
elections will be so much better than before,” he told supporters
outside his party’s headquarters. “I have been busy with Mr Kem Sokha
preparing to have an election law to be better … and not to have ballot
fraud like before to ensure that we will respect [the result].”
Kuoy Bunroeun, head of the CNRP’s reform working group, said
yesterday after a meeting of the two parties at the National Assembly to
finalise the wording of the law that the parties “respect the freedom
of expression of individuals”.
He added that a public seminar would be held next week to consult with civil society.
His CPP counterpart, Bin Chhin, said that the concerns of NGOs could
be raised at the event and that the parties would “consider” them.
The representatives also confirmed that a provision to prevent
post-election deadlock by forcing all parties that win seats to attend
parliament – as Prime Minister Hun Sen recently called for – would be
discussed in the future and added to a relevant law.
No comments:
Post a Comment