“I am particularly worried about how small farmers [majority Cambodians] will compete with more imports,” he said. “But businesses also fear losing their labor to better-paid jobs in Asean, and youth are worried about losing jobs to skilled labor.”
The AEC Has Arrived, But Benefits for Cambodia Are Far Off
Cambodia Daily | 1 January 2016
Nearly a decade in the making, the Asean Economic Community (AEC)
officially launches today. But economists say it will not have an
immediate impact on Cambodia, with numerous domestic and regional
challenges still standing in the way of closer integration.
“Nothing significant is going to happen for some time yet; the
preparations will need to continue for another 10 years before the AEC
can be fully realized,” Jayant Menon, lead economist at the Asian
Development Bank’s (ADB) regional integration office, said in an
interview earlier this month.
– News Analysis
The AEC aims to integrate Asean’s 10 member countries into the
world’s seventh largest economy—home to more than 600 million people.
“The AEC 2015 envisages: a single market and production base, a highly competitive economic region, a region of equitable economic development and a region fully integrated into the global economy,” Asean’s official website says.
“[It] will transform Asean into a region with free movement of goods,
services, investment, skilled labor and freer flow of capital.”
But with many of the foundational agreements already in place,
December 31 will serve only as a symbolic date as the AEC continues to
take shape. At the 27th Asean Summit in Kuala Lumpur last month, the
bloc’s leaders acknowledged the longer-term economic, political and
social challenges ahead by adopting the AEC Blueprint 2025, which
extends the timeframe for integration.
For example, Mr. Menon explained, “While tariffs have fallen as part
of the AEC, nontariff and border barriers remain and must still be
tackled.” These impediments to trade include country-specific standards
and regulations, administrative charges and quantity-control measures.
“Additional constraints to trade can be significantly reduced if
Cambodia and individual nations focus on developing their National
Single Window [NSW]—and connect it to the Asean Single Window [ASW],”
Mr. Menon said. The NSW and ASW systems expedite trade in goods and
services by standardizing forms and documents at the national and
regional levels.
“Cambodia needs to focus on developing its National Single Window
project: a one-stop shop where trade of goods and services can be
standardized and therefore expedited,” Mr. Menon said.
Since Cambodia joined the World Trade Organization in 2004, endeavors
to liberalize trade by cutting tariffs and subsidies opened the country
to new investment opportunities, which Srey Chanthy, a local economist,
hopes will be augmented by the AEC.
“Nowhere on Earth is more accessible in terms of trade than Cambodia
already is, so I expect the greatest benefits of the AEC to come from
FDI [foreign direct investment] opportunities,” he said.
Trade and investment integration agreements signed in the lead- up to
the AEC have helped to boost the region’s global influence. Between
2007 and 2014, Asean trade increased by nearly $1 trillion, and the bloc
currently accounts for about 11 percent of global FDI inflows.
For Cambodia, the main benefit lies in the potential of the AEC to
connect the country to global value chains—especially as developed
economies look to shift production to cheaper locales in the region, Mr.
Chanthy said.
“Because the market is larger, businesses will need to compete better
by hopefully becoming more efficient and innovative in order to attract
investment,” he said. “Public systems such as infrastructure, including
roads, are also likely to improve as the government seeks to comply
with the Asean agreement and attract FDI.”
And while the added pressure of new competition could force smaller
and less efficient businesses to fold, and less-skilled labor to lose
their jobs, Mr. Chanthy said, there would be at least a six-month lag
before the net impact of this competition could be assessed.
“I am particularly worried about how small farmers [majority Cambodians] will compete with
more imports,” he said. “But businesses also fear losing their labor to
better-paid jobs in Asean, and youth are worried about losing jobs to
skilled labor.”
The AEC also seeks to improve the mobility of skilled labor between
Asean members, in part by streamlining the issuance of visa and work
permits for professionals.
John McGinley, managing partner at Mekong Strategic Partners, noted
that many Cambodian businesses and workers mistakenly believe that the
AEC will trigger an outflow of both skilled and unskilled labor, such as
that experienced by less-developed members of the European Union.
“The AEC has a much more limited approach to labor migration compared
to the E.U.,” Mr. McGinley said in an email. “It only permits the flow
of labor for eight skilled and specialized sectors being: Engineering,
Nursing, Architecture, Medicine, Dentistry, Tourism, Surveying and
Accounting.”
And with the scope of mobility for these skilled professions still
subject to additional constraints, Mr. McGinley said he did not
anticipate a significant impact from greater movement of labor in the
immediate future.
“For example, a qualified and practicing Cambodian doctor could not
migrate to Thailand and immediately begin practicing medicine,” he said.
“In order to qualify they would still need to study medicine in a Thai
university, in Thai language, and gain accreditation according to Thai
national standards.”
The AEC’s goal for a more liberalized Asean marketplace also includes
the “freer flow of capital,” partly by harmonizing financial market
regulations.
This is expected to be a particularly challenging ambition given the
economic diversity among Asean members, the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development notes in its “Economic Outlook for Southeast
Asia, China and India 2016” report, released last month.
“Access to finance appears to be more of a problem in some member
states than others,” the report says. “This is largely due to the lack
of a well-developed regulatory framework, credit risk guarantees and
central bureaus for credit information.”
The report also emphasizes the wider challenges of aligning the
national ambitions and abilities of what is ultimately a two-speed
region, with the wealthier “Asean-6” (Singapore, Brunei, Thailand,
Malaysia, the Philippines and Indonesia) leading the way, and the poorer
CLMV countries (Cambodia, Laos, Burma and Vietnam) trailing behind.
As members face their unique challenges, the ambitions of the AEC are
expected to solidify in the coming decade, and the Cambodian government
is positioning the country to benefit, said government spokesman Phay
Siphan.
“We are making reforms and adding regulations for trade, investment
and tax to ensure we comply with Asean’s uniform codes,” Mr. Siphan
said. “But mainly, we are preparing businesses and labor to become more
competitive in the new environment.”
While greater regional connectivity will be a boon to Cambodia, Mr.
Menon of the ADB noted that nothing would unlock the country’s potential
more than addressing fundamental shortcomings.
“In Cambodia, the main problem is red tape, corruption, the legal
environment and cost of electricity that make it difficult to do
business,” he said.
“Cambodia indeed has more time to prepare—it must first overcome basic development challenges.”
No comments:
Post a Comment