Cambodia passes disputed trade union law as tension flares
PHNOM PENH, April 4 (Reuters) - Cambodia's parliament
approved a disputed trade union law on Monday without making
changes demanded by labour groups and the opposition, who
decried it as too strict and designed to limit workers' rights.
The law is a hotly contested issue in Cambodia, where the $5
billion textiles and footwear sector is the biggest employer and
economic driver, producing goods for Nike, H&M,
Puma, Marks and Spencer and Inditex,
among more than a dozen global brands.
Some of about 100 protesters clashed with security guards
outside the National Assembly before the bill was passed and at
least two union activists suffered bloody head injuries.
"We're worried as it will affect our rights to hold strikes.
They (the government) will interfere in our work, they can
suspend and dissolve us," said Ath Thon, president of the
Coalition of Cambodian Apparel Workers Democratic Union.
The law sets rules on how unions are formed, operated and
dissolved and was passed in its original form, without
alterations requested by unions, employers and rights groups.
Business owners requested the rules in 2007 to prevent
strikes by unions representing some 700,000 workers in an
industry that has grown rapidly, partly because it undercuts
China's factories.
The unrest has dogged Cambodia, with protests over pay a
perennial problem for the government and an issue for brands
worried about interrupted orders and negative publicity.
Unions and the CNRP had urged parliament to remove from the
law all articles on suspending unions and requirements for them
to prepare financial reports.
Ath Thon said union leaders would push for amendments but
would not hold large protests due to fears of a repeat of
previous violence and crackdowns by the authorities.
Labour Minister Ith Sam Heng told parliament the legislation
would bring stability and bigger investment. Ruling party
lawmaker Chheang Vun defended the bill and said it would
ultimately benefit workers.
"This sector is the rice pot for all of us," he said. "The
government has the duty to protect this pot so there is rice for
us to eat."
No comments:
Post a Comment