We live in an age when it’s considered sophisticated to be disenchanted. But people who are enchanted are the real tough cookies.
Damon Winter/The New York Times |
Making Modern Toughness
Iteratioal ew York Times | 30 August 2016
David Brooks |
When I
ask veteran college teachers and administrators to describe how college
students have changed over the years, I often get an answer like this: “Today’s
students are more accomplished than past generations, but they are also more
emotionally fragile.”
That
rings true to me. Today’s students are amazing, but they bathe one another in
oceans of affirmation and praise, as if buttressing one another against some
insecurity. Whatever one thinks of the campus protests, the desire for trigger
warnings and safe spaces does seem to emanate from a place of emotional
fragility.
And if
you hang around the middle aged, you hear a common story line to explain the
rise of the orchid generation. Once upon a time, the story line goes, kids were
raised in a tough environment. They had to do hard manual chores around the
house and they got in fights on the playground. Then they went off to do
grueling work in the factory or they learned toughness and grit in the
military.
But
today, helicopter parents protect their children from setbacks and hardship.
They supervise every playground conflict, so kids never learn to handle
disputes or deal with pain.
There’s
a lot of truth to that narrative, but let’s not be too nostalgic for the past.
A lot of what we take to be the toughness of the past was really just callousness.
There was a greater tendency in years gone by to wall off emotions, to put on a
thick skin — for some men to be stone-like and uncommunicative and for some
women to be brittle, brassy and untouchable.
And
then many people turned to alcohol to help them feel anything at all.
Perhaps
it’s time to rethink toughness or at least detach it from hardness. Being
emotionally resilient is not some defensive posture. It’s not having some armor
surrounding you so that nothing can hurt you.
The
people we admire for being resilient are not hard; they are ardent. They have a
fervent commitment to some cause, some ideal or some relationship. That higher
yearning enables them to withstand setbacks, pain and betrayal.
Such
people are, as they say in the martial arts world, strong like water. A blow
might sink into them, and when it does they are profoundly affected by it. But
they can absorb the blow because it’s short term while their natural shape is
long term.
There
are moments when they feel swallowed up by fear. They feel and live in the
pain. But they work through it and their ardent yearning is still there, and
they return to an altered wholeness.
In this
way of thinking, grit, resilience and toughness are not traits that people
possess intrinsically. They are not tools you can possess independently for the
sake of themselves. They are means inspired by an end.
John R.
Lewis may not have been intrinsically tough, but he was tough in the name of
civil rights. Mother Teresa may not have been intrinsically steadfast, but she
was steadfast in the name of God. The people around us may not be remorselessly
gritty, but they can be that when it comes to protecting their loved ones, when
it comes to some dream for their future self.
People
are much stronger than they think they are when in pursuit of their telos,
their purpose for living. As Nietzsche put it, “He who has a why to live for
can bear almost any how.”
In
short, emotional fragility is not only caused by overprotective parenting. It’s
also caused by anything that makes it harder for people to find their telos.
It’s caused by the culture of modern psychology, which sometimes tries to talk
about psychological traits in isolation from moral purposes. It’s caused by the
ethos of the modern university, which in the name of “critical thinking”
encourages students to be detached and corrosively skeptical. It’s caused by
the status code of modern meritocracy, which encourages people to pursue
success symbols that they don’t actually desire.
We are
all fragile when we don’t know what our purpose is, when we haven’t thrown
ourselves with abandon into a social role, when we haven’t committed ourselves
to certain people, when we feel like a swimmer in an ocean with no edge.
If you
really want people to be tough, make them idealistic for some cause, make them
tender for some other person, make them committed to some worldview that puts
today’s temporary pain in the context of a larger hope.
Emotional
fragility seems like a psychological problem, but it has only a philosophical
answer. People are really tough only after they have taken a leap of faith for
some truth or mission or love. Once they’ve done that they can withstand a lot.
We live
in an age when it’s considered sophisticated to be disenchanted. But people who
are enchanted are the real tough cookies.
I read some of Brooks' articles, ando few of his predictions. His prediction about Trump failed miserably.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, I have never heard the words "Khmer Democrat". It appears this Khmer Democrat has zero clue about the real democrat.
The democrat party is the racist party, and the Klane of KKK Was the the terrorist wing of the democrat party. The democrat favors slavery. True democrat party should be allowed to be told and taught.
Typo. I meant and a few of his predictions
ReplyDeleteDesenchantee.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siIoizAZRcU
-Drgunzet-