The Most Powerful American In Cambodia: The Unlikely Rise Of Bretton Sciaroni
Forbes | 1 September 2016
Bretton Sciaroni came to Cambodia in
1993, the year of its first democratic election after more than two
decades of tumultuous rule by the U.S.-backed Lon Nol regime, the Khmer
Rouge, and then a Vietnamese occupation force. It was a second chance
for a country that had only gained independence from France in 1953, and
a second chance for Sciaroni.
In 1987, at age 35, the American lawyer
had seen his career very publicly blow up after a seemingly meteoritic
rise to the Reagan White House. He had been hired as counsel for the
President’s Intelligence Oversight Board, but his luck ran out when he
became embroiled in the Iran-Contra Affair that rocked the last years of the Reagan administration.
After facing a public whipping in the U.S. press when
it was revealed he had failed the bar exam four times, it is perhaps
unsurprising that he agreed to an unlikely job in a war-torn country
halfway around the word several years later. On the suggestion of Dana Rohrabacher, a Republican congressman in California, the
one-time Reaganite was now ironically tasked with helping the formerly
communist Cambodian People’s Party run its first campaign as a modern
political party.
“When I arrived out here, it was a single
male-only posting. There were no hospitals, no schools. It was the Wild
West in those days. Every cop on the street corner had an AK-47,”
Sciaroni said of his early days in Phnom Penh during an interview at his
office earlier this summer.
What was meant to be a short term stint
would instead set Sciaroni, now in his 60s, on the path to become one of
the most powerful American expatriates in Cambodia with the help of his
influential law firm, Sciaroni and Associates.
He also maintains deep ties with the foreign business community as the
head of the American Chamber of Commerce and the International Business
Club, and has been a “Legal Adviser to the Royal Government of Cambodia”
since 1995 – which carries a rank equivalent to government minister.
Sciaroni is in the words of the current
U.S. Ambassador to Cambodia, William A. Heidt, a central figure in Phnom
Penh’s foreign community: “Brett Sciaroni was one of the first foreign
lawyers in Cambodia in the early 1990s, after Cambodian democracy was
restored. He has been a pillar of the U.S. business community ever
since, promoting U.S. investment in Cambodia through his law firm and in
his role as the founder and head of the American Chamber of Commerce,”
Heidt said in a statement by email.
Sciaroni and Hun Sen – who he calls a “fascinating guy” – have
more in common than meets the eye. Born approximately a year apart,
albeit in very different circumstances, they have both made their
careers out of their political staying power and the ability to reinvent
themselves.
As a former Khmer Rouge commander, Hun Sen has had the unique ability to change with the times
and survive. He defected to Vietnam during a period of internal purges
in the Khmer Rouge in 1977, and was subsequently appointed to head the
Vietnamese-backed regime in 1985 during its ten-year occupation of
Cambodia. Since then, Hun Sen has reinvented himself yet again as a
“modern democratic leader” in the 1990s – some [most] would say a politically repressive autocrat – and is now best known for his love of golf and Facebook.
Sciaroni has also transformed himself from a low-point in the late 1980s into a modern-day legal powerhouse. In 1987, a Congressional investigation found Sciaroni had written the classified legal opinion
justifying the funding of the right-wing Nicaraguan Contras by the U.S.
National Security Committee – despite a Congressional ban – with
profits from weapon sales to arch-enemy Iran. [Didn't he pen "the White Paper" denying the 1997 coup d'état as a coup d'état ?*] He was subsequently
pilloried by the American press but he still speaks favourably of his
time at the White House and President Reagan, who he describes as an
“inspirational figure.”
“I have no regrets at all. I was under
fire because there were people on Capitol Hill who didn’t like my legal
opinion. It wasn’t like I was under scrutiny for having done anything
wrong, it was just – for the Democrats on the Hill – politically
incorrect to write what I wrote,” he said.
The irony of an ex-Reaganite working with
former communists was not lost on Sciaroni, although he personally
found many former members of the Khmer Rouge to be more pragmatic than
political by the 1990s. “They say, and I do believe, they weren’t
communist by conviction, they were communist by circumstance. That’s why
after the Vietnamese left in the late 1980s, this place changed very
rapidly into a free market economy. There weren’t a lot of very
dedicated communists,” Sciaroni said of the Cambodian People’s Party.
“When I came here, I used to go to party
official’s offices, and in those days the bookshelves were full of Marx,
Lenin, Engels. But I will bet you, if I took any volume off the shelf, I
would have broken the back of the book. It probably had never been
opened. These people were survivors, and they went with the Vietnamese
not out of conviction but because they had to survive,” he added later.
While the CPP lost the 1993 election – despite its alleged use of death squads against political opponents –
Sciaroni stayed on in Cambodia and founded his own law firm, Sciaroni
and Associates. As a lawyer working with the Cambodian government, he
helped it to recover assets frozen in the U.S. during the Khmer Rouge
regime as well as draft some of Cambodia’s first laws on finance,
according to his biography on Sciaroni and Associates’ website. He also
advised Cambodia’s delegation to the UNESCO World Heritage Committee,
which finally succeeded in inscribing the Angkor-era Preah Vihear Temple
as a world heritage site. (The temple was also claimed by Thailand and
the subject of a long-running legal dispute starting in 1959.)
In the private sector, Sciaroni’s firm has also advised U.S. and international business interests entering the Cambodian market. Sciaroni kept mum on which companies he helped, although a 2011 profile of Sciaroni on Salon.com claims they include Chevron, Mistubishi, Japanese conglomerate Mitsui, and Anglo-Australian mining multinational BHP Billiton.
“I do quite a bit of informal advice or
advice wearing my AmCham hat. For market entry, they need to know not
just the legal requirements, but they need to understand something about
how the economy works,” Sciaroni said. He also continues to work with
the U.S. Embassy on business-related issues, and says they are “both
keen on getting Cambodia to commit to a bilateral investment treaty” as
well as the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
These days, Sciaroni is a fixture at
Phnom Penh business gatherings. He is easy to spot with his trademark
mustache, retro gold-rimmed glasses, and a flashy gold bracelet. He is
typically surrounded by an entourage of associates and individuals
hoping to speak with him. Name-dropping Sciaroni prompts instant
recognition in business circles, and he maintains a close relationship
with the U.S. Embassy. He has pivoted once again, into what may become
his final role, as an elder-statesman of Cambodia’s business community.
One of the most common misconceptions
about Sciaroni, at least in Phnom Penh circles, is that in his 23 years
in Cambodia he is the “lawyer“ (and
presumably “friend”) of long-serving Prime Minister Hun Sen, who also
heads the Cambodian People’s Party. By Sciaroni’s admission they sound
closer to acquaintances, who have worked for the same party but not
closely together.
“I view him as the key transitional figure for Cambodia
because he’s trying to bridge the gap between the old way of doing
things and entry into the modern world. He is a manger of a system of
interests, and it’s his job to keep everybody moving more or less in the
same direction,” Sciaroni said. “So you have political factions,
economic factions, regional factions. And his job is to keep everybody
on the same page more or less, and that’s not an easy job for a country
like this.”
* Those who deny that the events constituted a coup base their arguments
primarily on a Government White Paper issued soon after the fighting in Phnom Penh was
over. The White Paper stated that "the government" took military action against
Prince Ranariddh and his military forces in order to prevent the return of the Khmer Rouge
to power. The paper accuses Prince Ranariddh of engaging in collaboration with the Khmer
Rouge to oppose Hun Sen. Further, Ranariddh was also allegedly engaged in illegal arms
smuggling, secretly attempting to move 3 tons of ammunition to Phnom Penh.
The opponents of the "coup" interpretation are themselves
biased for taking the White Paper at face value. Much of the information the paper
provides is correct, including Prince Ranariddh’s alleged negotiations with the Khmer
Rouge; but it deliberately leaves out much more detail that implicates the CPP in some of
the "crimes" for which FUNCINPEC stood accused. Further, the details of troop
movements and fighting on July 5-6 are factually inaccurate in the CPP presentation of
events.
No comments:
Post a Comment