Kem Sokha Says People, Not Wall, Must Protect Borders
Cambodia Daily | 21 November 2016
Invoking U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s pledge to build a wall
on the border with Mexico, deputy opposition leader Kem Sokha said
Cambodia could not afford such infrastructure, but still must focus on
securing the border with Vietnam.
Mr. Sokha was speaking on Sunday
to hundreds of youth activists at the CNRP’s Phnom Penh headquarters,
where he told them to focus their campaigning for upcoming elections on
the CNRP’s plan to strengthen border protection. The CNRP has long
campaigned against illegal Vietnamese immigration and Vietnamese
incursions into Cambodia.

“We have to develop the
border by getting a lot of people to live along the border. First, build
boundary roads along the border; second, markets, pagodas, jobs,
factories and agriculture farming,” Mr. Sokha said.
The acting
CNRP president said the opposition’s previous campaigns criticizing the
government’s work defending the border—focusing on ongoing Vietnamese
incursions—had failed to offer constructive solutions.
“We have attacked them, but we don’t have new recommendations, so we could not find national reunification,” he said.
The
CNRP led various trips to disputed areas along the Vietnamese border in
the middle of last year, prompting the government to release diplomatic
notes to Hanoi asking Vietnam to halt construction or pull back from
contested border sites.
Prime Minister Hun Sen largely silenced
the campaign by ordering the arrest of opposition Senator Hong Sok Hour
in August last year and announcing that anyone claiming that the
government was using the wrong maps to define the border would face a
similar fate.
However, the issue has not gone away, and Border
Affairs Minister Var Kimhong made the remarkably frank admission last
month that Cambodia was helpless in stopping Vietnam from building in at
least one “white zone,” areas that both countries have agreed to stay
out of until they agree on the border line.
“We asked them to
stop, but they did not listen to us,” Mr. Kimhong said of a Vietnamese
border guard office that was being built in a white zone in Ratanakkiri
province.
“Please tell me: If they don’t stop, what can we do?”
the minister asked. “Do you want Cambodia to start a war with Vietnam to
stop the construction?”
Mr. Sokha said on Sunday that there were
more effective ways for Cambodia to defend its land if proper resources
were devoted to the efforts, pointing to the fact that many Thai and
Vietnamese citizens live relatively well along their country’s borders.
“Why
do a lot of their people live on the border? They get encouragement,
enough water, job creation, loans without interest rates,” Mr. Sokha
said.
“We have to provide agricultural technicians. Second,
provide capital free of interest rates or given at low interest rates.
Third, make sure to find a market for whoever lives along the border,”
he added.

Building
a physical barrier along the border, however, was out of the question,
Mr. Sokha added, referencing the promise from Mr. Trump to build a
“impenetrable and beautiful” wall to keep illegal Mexican immigrants out
of the U.S.
“Our National Rescue Party already has a policy: When
we win the election to lead the country we will protect the border—we
don’t have money to build a wall like Mr. Trump,” Mr. Sokha said.
Ruling
party spokesman Sok Eysan said that some of Mr. Sokha’s suggestions for
encouraging better lives along the border were absurd, and that the CPP
had already been implementing others.
“It is the speech of a
cheater. Does any government in the world give loans to people without
charging an interest rate?” he said. “It is the gamble of campaigning.
It is easy to say such things.”
Mr. Eysan said that other parts of
Mr. Sokha’s border plans mirrored those of the CPP, which had already
worked to turn war-torn areas into livable border towns.
“We
worked to change the border line that was a war field before to become a
developed area with markets and harmonization between people and people
and country and country, so he said this after the CPP,” he said.
Ou
Virak, a political analyst who has criticized the CNRP for falling back
on anti-Vietnamese rhetoric to gain support, said the border issue was a
major concern of the people, but needed to be discussed in a way that
did not fuel already widespread anti-Vietnamese sentiment.
“I
think the border is an effective issue. It’s one of those issues that
the CPP finds very difficult to shake off because the CPP refuses to
discuss the history,” Mr. Virak said.
“It all depends on how they
raise the issue, and from past campaigns they have been pretty racist in
their remarks and the things they said, so that’s dangerous,” he said
of the CNRP.
“But also, while they raise the issue of a secure
border, it went too far in the sense that they didn’t have a concrete or
reasonable proposal for how to deal with it.”
No comments:
Post a Comment