The death of reading is threatening the soul
Philip Yancey / Washington Post | 2
I am going through a personal crisis. I used to love reading. I am
writing this blog in my office, surrounded by 27 tall bookcases laden
with 5,000 books. Over the years I have read them, marked them up, and
recorded the annotations in a computer database for potential references
in my writing. To a large degree, they have formed my professional and
spiritual life.
Books help define who I am. They have ushered me
on a journey of faith, have introduced me to the wonders of science and
the natural world, have informed me about issues such as justice and
race. More importantly, they have been a source of delight and adventure
and beauty, opening windows to a reality I would not otherwise know.
My
crisis consists in the fact that I am describing my past, not my
present. I used to read three books a week. One year I devoted an
evening each week to read all of Shakespeare’s plays (Okay, due to
interruptions it actually took me two years). Another year I read the
major works of Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. But I am reading many fewer books
these days, and even fewer of the kinds of books that require hard
work.
The Internet and social media have trained my brain to read a
paragraph or two, and then start looking around. When I read an online
article from the Atlantic or the New Yorker, after a few paragraphs I
glance over at the slide bar to judge the article’s length. My mind
strays, and I find myself clicking on the sidebars and the underlined
links. Soon I’m over at CNN.com reading Donald Trump’s latest tweets and
details of the latest terrorist attack, or perhaps checking tomorrow’s
weather.
Worse, I fall prey to the little boxes that tell me, “If
you like this article [or book], you’ll also like…” Or I glance at the
bottom of the screen and scan the teasers for more engaging tidbits: 30
Amish Facts That’ll Make Your Skin Crawl; Top 10 Celebrity Wardrobe
Malfunctions; Walmart Cameras Captured These Hilarious Photos. A dozen
or more clicks later I have lost interest in the original article.
Neuroscientists
have an explanation for this phenomenon. When we learn something quick
and new, we get a dopamine rush; functional-MRI brain scans show the
brain’s pleasure centers lighting up. In a famous experiment, rats keep
pressing a lever to get that dopamine rush, choosing it over food or
sex. In humans, emails also satisfy that pleasure center, as do Twitter
and Instagram and Snapchat.
Nicholas Carr’s book “The Shallows” analyzes the phenomenon, and its
subtitle says it all: “What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains.” Carr
spells out that most Americans, and young people especially, are showing
a precipitous decline in the amount of time spent reading. He says,
“Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the
surface like a guy on a Jet Ski.” A 2016 Nielsen report calculates that
the average American devotes more than 10 hours per day to consuming
media—including radio, TV, and all electronic devices. That constitutes
65 percent of waking hours, leaving little time for the much harder work
of focused concentration on reading.
In “The Gutenberg Elegies,”
Sven Birkerts laments the loss of “deep reading,” which requires
intense concentration, a conscious lowering of the gates of perception,
and a slower pace. His book hit me with the force of conviction. I keep
putting off Charles Taylor’s “A Secular Age,” and look at my shelf full
of Jürgen Multmann’s theology books with a feeling of nostalgia—why am I
not reading books like that now?
An article in Business Insider
studied such pioneers as Elon Musk, Oprah Winfrey, Bill Gates, Warren
Buffett and Mark Zuckerberg. Most of them have in common a practice the
author calls the “5-hour rule”: they set aside at least an hour a day
(or five hours a week) for deliberate learning. For example:
• Bill Gates reads 50 books a year.
• Mark Zuckerberg reads at least one book every two weeks.
• Elon Musk grew up reading two books a day.
• Mark Cuban reads for more than three hours every day.
• Arthur Blank, a co-founder of Home Depot, reads two hours a day.
When asked about his secret to success, Warren Buffett pointed to a
stack of books and said, “Read 500 pages like this every day. That’s how
knowledge works. It builds up, like compound interest. All of you can
do it, but I guarantee not many of you will…” Charles Chu, who quoted
Buffett on the Quartz website, acknowledges that 500 pages a day is
beyond reach for all but a few people. Nevertheless, neuroscience proves
what each of these busy people have found: it actually takes less
energy to focus intently than to zip from task to task. After an hour of
contemplation, or deep reading, a person ends up less tired and less
neurochemically depleted, thus more able to tackle mental challenges.
If we can’t reach Buffett’s high reading bar, what is a realistic goal? Charles Chu calculates
that at an average reading speed of 400 words per minute, it would take
417 hours in a year to read 200 books—less than the 608 hours the
average American spends on social media, or the 1,642 hours watching TV.
“Here’s the simple truth behind reading a lot of books,” says Quartz:
“It’s not that hard. We have all the time we need. The scary part—the
part we all ignore—is that we are too addicted, too weak, and too
distracted to do what we all know is important.”
Willpower alone
is not enough, he says. We need to construct what he calls “a fortress
of habits.” I like that image. Recently I checked author Annie Dillard’s
website, in which she states, “I can no longer travel, can’t meet with
strangers, can’t sign books but will sign labels with SASE, can’t write
by request, and can’t answer letters. I’ve got to read and concentrate.
Why? Beats me.” Now that’s a fortress.
I’ve concluded that a commitment to reading is an ongoing battle,
somewhat like the battle against the seduction of Internet pornography.
We have to build a fortress with walls strong enough to withstand the
temptations of that powerful dopamine rush while also providing shelter
for an environment that allows deep reading to flourish. Christians
especially need that sheltering space, for quiet meditation is one of
the most important spiritual disciplines.
Modern culture presents
formidable obstacles to the nurture of both spirituality and
creativity. As a writer of faith in the age of social media, I host a
Facebook page and a website and write an occasional blog. Thirty years
ago I got a lot of letters from readers, and they did not expect an
answer for a week or more. Now I get emails, and if they don’t hear back
in two days they write again, “Did you get my email?” The tyranny of
the urgent crowds in around me.
If I yield to that tyranny, my
life fills with mental clutter. Boredom, say the researchers, is when
creativity happens. A wandering mind wanders into new, unexpected
places. When I retire to the mountains and unplug for a few days,
something magical takes place. I’ll go to bed puzzling over a roadblock
in my writing, and the next morning wake up with the solution
crystal-clear—something that never happens when I spend my spare time
cruising social media and the Internet.
I find that poetry helps. You can’t zoom through poetry; it forces
you to slow down, think, concentrate, relish words and phrases. I now
try to begin each day with a selection from George Herbert, Gerard
Manley Hopkins, or R. S. Thomas.
For deep reading, I’m searching
for an hour a day when mental energy is at a peak, not a scrap of time
salvaged from other tasks. I put on headphones and listen to soothing
music, shutting out distractions.
Deliberately, I don’t text. I
used to be embarrassed when I pulled out my antiquated flip phone, which
my wife says should be donated to a museum. Now I pocket it with a kind
of perverse pride, feeling sorry for the teenagers who check their
phones on average 2,000 times a day.
We’re engaged in a war, and
technology wields the heavy weapons. Rod Dreher recent book, “‘The
Benedict Option,” urges people of faith to retreat behind monastic walls
as the Benedictines did — after all, they preserved literacy and
culture during one of the darkest eras of human history. I don’t
completely agree with Dreher, though I’m convinced that the preservation
of reading will require something akin to the Benedict option.
I’m
still working on that fortress of habit, trying to resurrect the rich
nourishment that reading has long provided for me. If only I can resist
clicking on the link 30 Amish Facts That’ll Make Your Skin Crawl…
I have read so far, 2000 books and 10,000 articles.
ReplyDelete-Drgunzet-
Sick YUON's propagandist spamming, ignored/skipped.
DeleteI issue an intellectual challenge to all Khmers. Come, all at once, I take on you all.
ReplyDelete-Drgunzet0
I'm still reading his biography,chapter 3. The punk got kicked by a 3 year old girl when he tried to molest her in Idaho.
ReplyDeleteI have never lived in Idaho. The gateway of my internet service provider happened to be in Idaho, ok? LOL at the Khmers.
Delete-Drgunzet-