An aerial view of the Chong Kneas floating village and a number of traditional arrowhead-style fish traps exposed by record low water levels on the Tonle Sap Lake in Siem Reap province last year. Over 80,000 people live directly on the lake, and experts say their livelihoods are at risk. Alessandro Marazzi Sassoon |
The point of no return
Cambodia’s most important ecosystem is in crisis, experts say. Millions rely on the Tonle Sap lake for food and irrigation, and its destruction would have repercussions across the whole Kingdom. What can be done?
Phnom Penh Post | 1 August 2017
The Tonle Sap is “doomed”.
The ecosystem of the gigantic lake – whose annual flood cycle has
been the pulse of Cambodia for millennia, and on which millions depend
for food and irrigation – is set to spectacularly collapse, throwing
into question everything from Cambodia’s food security, to its economy,
to its demographics.
At least, that is, if drastic measures aren’t taken – and soon.
Such was the prevailing sentiment at the International Symposium on
Flood pulse Ecosystems, where researchers convened last week in Siem
Reap for a conference whose tone alternated between frustrated and
funereal.
In more than a dozen interviews, Cambodian and international experts
from a range of natural and social sciences studying the Mekong River,
the Tonle Sap and the surrounding floodplain pointed to the
already-visible effects of climate change, overfishing [and pollution from the illegal undoumented Vietnamese fishing villages] and dam
construction on the indispensable ecosystem as cause for tremendous
concern.
Acknowledging that changes have already been seen in annual rainfall
and to the all-important “flood pulse” – the cyclical flooding of the
Tonle Sap from the Mekong River that is crucial for fish production and
floodplain agriculture – Environment Minister Say Sam Al pledged support
for researchers and issued a call for solutions.
“The seasonal flood pulse cycle is very important. If we do not have
that, then there would be a lot of problems,” he said, going on to ask
the room: “How much change can the lake tolerate?”
The short answer, experts said, is not much.
Fisheries in flux
University of South Florida Professor Mauricio Arias, a leading
regional hydrologist who has studied the flood pulse for over a decade,
said that dams built upstream along the Mekong River, as well as the
effects of climate change, have irreversibly harmed the ecosystem.
“We talk about how climate change will affect, or how the dams will
affect, but we’re already seeing those changes happening,” he said,
adding that six hydropower dams already have left “strong signatures” on
the flood pulse. Three dams are currently under construction in the
Upper Mekong River, while 27 tributary dams are in the works in the
lower basin.
“We’re going from a wild Mekong . . . to a closed river system that’s
boring and dead [like the] Colorado River,” Arias said, referring to a
river in the American West that was heavily dammed.
This will almost certainly have an effect on the productivity of
Tonle Sap wetlands, which are dependent on the natural variation of the
flood pulse. The lake’s fishery accounts for some 75 percent of the
country’s protein production.
On top of the ecological threats, overfishing is already straining the country’s freshwater fisheries.
“The doubling of the population on the lower Mekong basin over the
last 30 years has been a major driver of change,” said Ratha Chea, a
freshwater ecologist and hydrologist at the University of Battambang.
As a result, he said, fishermen are working longer to bring in the same catch and travelling further from the lake shore.
“This could be a sign that the lake has reached its bearing
capacity,” he said. Chea noted that models already show a drop in
fisheries production by as much as 70 percent by 2040 from current
levels.
A Cambodian fisherwoman works on her boat near her house in Kompong Phluk, one of the floating villages on the Tonle Sap lake near Siem Reap. Chandan Khanna/AFP |
Fish catch data collected over a 15-year period ending 2015 show that
while production has remained steady in terms of total catch, the
composition of that catch has changed dramatically.
More and more, fishermen’s nets are filled with a selection of small
species of fish, while larger fish are becoming rarer, said Ngor Peng
Bun, a Fisheries Administration officer and doctoral candidate at the
University of Toulouse who analysed the data.
“This is not a good sign,” he said. “This is the sign of an unsustainable fishery.”
Kevin McCann, an ecologist from the University of Guelph, described
the data as “frightening”. An expert in modelling ecosystems, McCann
said that the changes in the fish population indicate that nature’s
ability to respond to heavy fishing has reached its limit.
“Within that, if you even look at the fast growing things, they’ve
been getting truncated . . . That’s the last straw before the system
can’t respond anymore,” he said.
Evan Fraser, a food security researcher from the University of
Guelph, said that the likely consequence of maintaining the status quo –
while adding more dams and suffering droughts in the region – could be a
“precipitous” decline in the fisheries.
Fraser’s research on how communities may respond to declining fish
production shows that in the absence of a policy that gives them
something else to do they will initially just fish more aggressively.
But as catches get poorer, Fraser continued, people will move away,
contributing to already existing concerns about migration.
Rice farmers harvest their crop in Battambang province in 2015. Heng Chivoan |
Fleeing a crisis
Chris Jacobson, a researcher from Australia’s University of the
Sunshine Coast, who spent 2015 and 2016 conducting fieldwork on
migration in collaboration with the UNFAO, the Environment Ministry and
the University of Battambang, sees financial hardship ahead for
floodplain farming communities.
She found that in four communes in three provinces around the lake
climate change was driving half of all migration. Migration had also
affected half of all households, she found, and among land-owning
farming families, nearly one-quarter had at least one family member
migrating due at least in part to climate change.
On top of that, she said, only half the time did sending a family
member away from the countryside to generate income actually help feed
more mouths, with food insecurity peaking at around 60 percent for
migrant households and at 45 percent for nonmigrant households in
September when rice is planted.
“We don’t know whether those communities have the resources to make
that switch or are stuck in a poverty trap,” she said. Such concerns
raise questions about what will happen should those who rely on the
water switch to agriculture.
For Jacobson, there’s a crucial need for more information about how
to address loss of livelihood due to environmental changes before a
policy solution can be devised.
While many farmers around the lake are already migrating for economic
survival – largely to Thailand or Phnom Penh, according to Jacobson –
livelihood changes among fishermen could lead to “social upheaval”,
which could potentially make food insecurity worse.
For Fraser, there’s no shortage of precedents to look at when it
comes to a rural-to-urban migration motivated by ecological factors.
“We’ve got lots of historical examples: the drought in Syria that
brought people into the city, the drought in Rwanda in the 1990’s that
is now seen as one of the catalysts for the Rwandan genocide,” he said.
“Going back even further you’ve got the French Revolution that began
as El Niño-induced droughts that pushed people out of the countryside
and into the streets of Paris. Typically history tells us that when this
dynamic happens people start taking to the streets in the cities,
protesting political corruption and a lack of services, poor
infrastructure, imbalanced power, and poor economics.”
A view of the Lower Sesan II hydropower dam construction site in Stung Treng province. The dam is scheduled to start generating power by the end of this year. Photo supplied |
The tipping point
Environment Minister Say Sam Al acknowledged the security concerns
about social disruption, saying a scientific assessment is needed.
“We will be committing funding to research [locally],” he said,
adding that funding would come through on a case-by-case basis and that
the ministry will also seek to improve research facilities at
universities throughout the Kingdom.
While the prognosis was dour among many experts, they also noted that
it is not too late for government to act decisively to manage the
changes.
For Mauricio Arias, the professor, investment needs to be made to develop forecasting tools to anticipate changes better.
“We need to know if a massive fire is going to happen ahead of time
. . . and forecast on a seasonal basis what will be happening with the
water, the landscape and the fish production,” he said.
According to Vittoria Elliot, the Mekong science director for
Conservation International, the ability to implement policy exists, but
solutions – for now theoretical – urgently need to be tested.
“We’re at the tipping point.”
She said there’s “still hope” for the fisheries, but sees the window
of time to act as no more than three years – in 2020 a hiatus on
building new dams is lifted. She predicted the planned 2,600-megawatt
Sambor dam in Kratie province would be the final straw for the country’s
fisheries if it is built.
“When you stick the Sambor dam in, then there’s no point in any of us talking about developing community fisheries,” she said.
For Ratha Seng, a socio-economist at the University of Battambang who
studies community fisheries, government reform is also needed.
“We [the scientific community] want to solve the problem, but we
cannot do anything without the participation of the government,” he
said, adding “we have quite a few science results but translating them
into something that will help make policy decisions is the next
challenge”.
“We’re at the tipping point.”
Say Sam Al is very stupid and lazy. He just enjoys eating his job instead of caring about the Cambodian Environment. He is afraid of his CPP boss which Hun Sen (a Vietnamese puppet).
ReplyDeleteយួនពេញស្រុក តើអស់លោកនឹង សម្ដេចហ៊ុនសែន ក្ដពីមុខឯងរាល់គ្នា គិតយ៉ាងម៉េច ឬយល់យ៉ាងម៉េចដែរ??? ឆ្លើយមក លោក ក្ដពីមុខឯងរាល់គ្នា!!!
ReplyDeleteSee? Yet another blatant lie from the Khmers:
ReplyDelete[and pollution from the illegal undoumented Vietnamese fishing villages]
The original article had not mentioned anything about the Vietnamese, yet, the Khmers decided to at lies and alter the facts.
I do acknowledge that there are ten-thousands of Vietnamese Cambodians living on and around Tonle Sap, but the Khmer Cambodians are in the millions.
I solve the problem, UN should really award Cambodia to the Vietnameses and the right things will be done.