Cambodia court opens massive trial of protesters amid heavy security
Twenty-five defendants face charges of vandalism and violence during bloody demonstrations
Military police rest inside Phnom Penh's Olympic Stadium, ahead of this morning's trial. At least a hundred military police were stationed in the stadium across from the court, as the government sought to prevent protests from breaking out. (Photo by Abby Seiff)
UCA News | April 25, 2014
Amid a heavy security presence that saw even witnesses being barred
from entry, Phnom Penh Municipal Court today began proceedings against
nearly two dozen people accused of property damage and intentional
violence during January’s bloody protests.
The case against 23 unionists, workers, protesters and
bystanders—including several high-profile activists—who were rounded up
over the course of two days in early January has come under heavy
criticism by rights groups who term the case political and the charges
unfounded. The court also simultaneously tried two other individuals who
were arrested during November clashes that saw the death of one
bystander and at least seven injuries.
The government has steadfastly maintained that such crackdowns were
necessary to staunch violent uprisings and has deemed no officials
guilty for the deaths. But the 10 arrested at Yakjin and 13 arrested the
following day have been shown little leniency thus far. Many were
seriously wounded after being beaten by police and all were inexplicably
remanded far from Phnom Penh to a notorious prison on the Vietnamese
border. After the arrests, their whereabouts were hidden from lawyers
and family members for nearly a week.
Spread out over three courtrooms, the sprawling case—the biggest
human rights-related trial in modern Cambodian history—aimed to assess
the guilt of 25 individuals arrested in three different incidents.
But in the courtrooms, it quickly became clear that the complexities
of such a case would be overshadowed by suggestions of a pre-determined
outcome.
As defendants were paraded one-by-one through Courtroom One (which
covered the Yakjin case) for questioning, prosecutors and the judge took
turns badgering the defense and their attorneys.
“The army was there because the anarchists came up to the gate and
tried to destroy everything. The lawyer should be asking how many
soldiers were injured by rock throwers,” an exasperated Judge Keo Mony
yelled at a defense lawyer after the latter tried to establish how many
soldiers were present.
Later, when defendant Nakry Vanda told the court he’d dropped his
motorbike and ran as a column of heavily-armed soldiers moved in to
break up protesters, the prosecutor pounced, calling it clear evidence
of his guilt.
“You’re involved with this case,” said a prosecutor. “You dropped
your motorbike and ran. If you weren’t involved, you wouldn’t have
pushed it down and run away.”
To help ascertain guilt, the judge showed each defendant one of two
photos taken outside Yakjin, in which a group of people can be seen
milling around the factory, and asked if they recognized the scene. None
of those questioned denied being present, but one after another each
insisted they were innocent of attacking officials.
As the day wore on, family members tried to remain hopeful but said they were concerned about a seemingly unjust court.
Sokun Sombath Visal, the brother of Sokun Sambath Piseth—an NGO
worker who was arrested while monitoring the protests at Yakjin—said the
fact that there was little inculpatory evidence seemed moot.
“I hope he will be released because he didn’t commit anything that
they have accused him of,” said Sombath Visal. “[But] I think there will
be injustice under the pressure of the government. It’s a political
court.”
During the arrest, police beat Sambath Piseth so badly they broke his
hand. Today, said his sister, his arm still hurts and they fear the
muscle may never properly heal. According to rights group Licadho, “the
delay in receiving appropriate and timely medical treatment means he may
lose full use of [his] hand.”
“I don’t know what the outcome will be. I’m just waiting. But I think
it will be unjust,” said his sister Sokun Sombath Leakhana.
Outside the court, barricades sealed the roads for a few hundred
meters in each direction. A few hundred protesters gathered at the
edges, where security was so strong that at least a dozen witnesses from
both sides were barred entry.
“It’s difficult to predict whether or not they will release them
because, in fact, the case depends on the politic[al situation]. The
government has put them as a political thing,” said Venerable An
Vicheth, a 29-year-old monk from the capital’s Wat Sarawan.
The case comes during renewed talk of political negotiations between
an opposition that has boycotted the government since the
widely-criticized July elections and a ruling party that’s growing
increasingly heavy-handed. Many have speculated that the group has
become a hostage for negotiations.
As dozens of international and local monitors crowded the courtrooms,
family members grinned as their sons, husbands, fathers and brothers
were led by in orange jumpsuits and shackles.
Teng Chantha, a garment worker at the Yakjin factory who had arrived
to present testimony corroborating her brother’s defense, said she was
happy just to get a glimpse of her brother. Twenty-one-year-old Teng
Chanthy, a student, was arrested while delivering lunch to his sister
the day of the clashes.
“I just got to see him this morning and he looks ok, but we didn’t
speak,” she said, adding it was the first time she had seen her brother
since she watched him being wrestled to the ground by police. “It’s too
expensive to visit, I’ve never been.”
Hearings will continue on May 6.
What a lowless land. The criminals are in power, the victims put to stand trial.
ReplyDeleteThe FALL of MANKIND. But at the end, everyone of us will stand before Jesus Christ, the Living God. Only the ones who obey God' s Laws and follow Him will be saved, the rest will be cut and throw to the hellfire.
ReplyDeleteMany Chrstians too who disobey God.