American Dignity on the Fourth of July
Reading Frederick Douglass’s Independence Day address from 1852 may ease the despair caused by listening to the President.
The New Yorker | 10-17 July 2017 Issue
More than three-quarters of a century after the
delegates of the Second Continental Congress voted to quit the Kingdom
of Great Britain and declared that “all men are created equal,”
Frederick Douglass stepped up to the lectern at Corinthian Hall, in
Rochester, New York, and, in an Independence Day address to the Ladies
of the Rochester Anti-Slavery Sewing Society, made manifest the darkest
ironies embedded in American history and in the national self-regard.
“What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July?” Douglass asked:
I answer; a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciations of tyrants, brass fronted impudence; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade, and solemnity, are, to him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy—a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages. There is not a nation on the earth guilty of practices, more shocking and bloody, than are the people of these United States, at this very hour.
The
dissection of American reality, in all its complexity, is essential to
political progress, and yet it rarely goes unpunished. One reason that
the Republican right and its attendant media loathed Barack Obama is
that his public rhetoric, while far more buoyant with
post-civil-rights-era uplift than Douglass’s, was also an affront to
reactionary pieties. Even as Obama tried to win votes, he did not paper
over the duality of the American condition: its idealism and its
injustices; its heroism in the fight against Fascism and its bloody
misadventures before and after. His idea of a patriotic song was
“America the Beautiful”—not in its sentimental ballpark versions but the
way that Ray Charles sang it, as a blues, capturing the “fullness of
the American experience, the view from the bottom as well as the top.”
Donald
Trump, who, in fairness, has noted that “Frederick Douglass is an
example of somebody who’s done an amazing job,” represents an entirely
different tradition. He has no interest in the wholeness of reality. He
descends from the lineage of the Know-Nothings, the doomsayers and the
fabulists, the nativists and the hucksters. The thematic shift from
Obama to Trump has been from “lifting as we climb” to “raising the
drawbridge and bolting the door.” Trump may operate a
twenty-first-century Twitter machine, but he is still a frontier-era
drummer peddling snake oil, juniper tar, and Dr. Tabler’s Buckeye Pile
Cure for profit from the back of a dusty wagon.
As
a candidate, Trump told his followers that he would fulfill “every
dream you ever dreamed for your country.” But he is a plutocrat. His
loyalty is to the interests of the plutocracy. Trump’s vows of
solidarity with the struggling working class, with the victims of
globalization and deindustrialization, are a fraud. He made coal miners a
symbol of his campaign, but he has always held them in contempt. To
him, they are luckless schmoes who fail to possess his ineffable
talents. “The coal miner gets black-lung disease, his son gets it, then his son,” Trump once told Playboy. “If I had
been the son of a coal miner, I would have left the damn mines. But
most people don’t have the imagination—or whatever—to leave their mine.
They don’t have ‘it.’ ”
Trump is hardly the
first bad President in American history—he has not had adequate time to
eclipse, in deed, the very worst—but when has any politician done so
much, so quickly, to demean his office, his country, and even the
language in which he attempts to speak? Every day, Trump wakes up and
erodes the dignity of the Presidency a little more. He tells a lie. He
tells another. He trolls Arnold Schwarzenegger. He trolls the press,
bellowing “enemy of the people” and “fake news!” He shoves aside a
Balkan head of state. He summons his Cabinet members to have them swear
fealty to his awesomeness. He leers at an Irish journalist. Last
Thursday, he tweeted at Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, of MSNBC:
“I heard poorly rated @Morning_Joe speaks badly of me (don’t watch
anymore). Then how come low I.Q. Crazy Mika, along with Psycho Joe,
came . . . to Mar-a-Lago 3 nights in a row around New Year’s Eve, and
insisted on joining me. She was bleeding badly from a face-lift. I said
no!” The President’s misogyny and his indecency are well established.
When is it time to question his mental stability?
The
atmosphere of debasement and indignity in the White House, it appears,
is contagious. Trump’s family and the aides who hastened to serve him
have learned to imitate his grossest reflexes, and to hell with the
contradictions. Melania Trump, whose “cause” is cyber-bullying, defends
the poisoned tweet at Brzezinski. His righteously feminist daughter
Ivanka stays mum. After the recent special election in Georgia,
Kellyanne Conway, the counsellor to the President, tweeted, “Laughing my
#Ossoff.” The wit! The valor! Verily, the return of Camelot!
Trump
began his national ascendancy by hoisting the racist banner of
birtherism. Since then, as candidate and as President, he has found
countless ways to pollute the national atmosphere. If someone suggests a
lie that is useful to him, he will happily pass it along or endorse it.
This habit is not without purpose or cumulative effect. Even if Trump
fails in his most ambitious policy initiatives, whether it is liberating
the wealthy from their tax obligations or liberating the poor from
their health care, he has already begun to foster a public sphere in
which, as Hannah Arendt put it in her treatise on totalitarian states,
millions come to believe that “everything was possible and that nothing
was true.”
Frederick Douglass ended his
Independence Day jeremiad in Rochester with steadfast optimism (“I do
not despair of this country”). Read his closing lines, and what despair
you might feel when listening to a President who abets ignorance,
isolation, and cynicism is eased, at least somewhat. The “mental
darkness” of earlier times is done, Douglass reminded his audience.
“Intelligence is penetrating the darkest corners of the globe.” There is
yet hope for the “great principles” of the Declaration of Independence
and “the genius of American Institutions.” There was reason for optimism
then, as there is now. Donald Trump is not forever. Sometimes it just
seems that way. ♦
No comments:
Post a Comment